Are You Serious?: Games for Girls Still About Cooking, Shopping and Snagging a Man

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Women in the tech field are few and far between. That’s why I was excited when I came across an article titled “Half of Tween Girls Are Online Gamers” while perusing the Mashable archives today. Since I’m a woman working in the tech field alongside Ballpoint CEO, Susan Leigh Babcock, I excitedly clicked to learn about this new generation of lady techies. Ultimately, I was saddened by what I found.

According to a new report, “50% of tween girls between the ages of 8 and 12 are turning to the Internet for entertainment and social gaming.” I was excited about this. I don’t really care about how many girls are gamers, I care about the fact that girls are just as familiar with technology — one of tomorrow’s biggest fields — as their y-chromosome toting counterparts. So, this seemed to be excellent news. Then I kept reading.

The report came from GirlsgoGames.com. A gaming site that’s made just for little girls. How wonderful, our gender informs the games we can play! (Insert sarcasm here.) Go to their website and you’ll immediately see that EVERYTHING is wrong. Apparently, girls of the millennial generation (AKA generation next) are still supposed to grow up to be trophy wives, cupcake bakers, and Suzy homemakers. Let me just say that all of those professions are fine in my book! You want to be a trophy wife? That’s your prerogative, sweetheart.

My issue is that we’re pushing these professions on our girls. By showing them *only* stereotypically feminine choices, aren’t we limiting their options? Aren’t these stupid games, with taglines like “When it comes to cakes, Sandy is in a league of her own.” or “Charm your way into these hunks’ hearts. May the best flirt win.”, embedding these notions into a new generation of women?

Although I’m not in favor of these girl or boy-only gaming sites, why can’t the games they feature be a little more substantial? For instance, I love animals so I’m totally in favor of keeping the cutesy animal games. But, why can’t they revolve around the notion that girls can grow up to be veterinarians who take care of these animals? An animal hospital game would be so much fun! It would accomplish the same thing, but would concurrently give little girls something to aspire to.

I’m just saying that my ability to decorate donuts, apply eyeliner, or flirt with hunks didn’t get me through college. And those things certainly didn’t get me a job in one of the worst job markets ever for recent graduates.

Parents, game developers, and little girls of the world, we can do better.

*Written by me, Kelley Lane, and originally posted here*

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Simone de Beauvoir & Lena Dunham

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

The feelings that come up when you read or watch someone you so readily admire and relate to, are really interesting. I realize today that my female heroes are women who so honestly depict their experience, they consequently mirror my own experiences. I’ve started reading Simone de Beauvoir’s memoirs; she writes about her emotional experiences growing older, self discovery, and her relationship to her family and the world around her. Literally every page, my mouth is hanging open with astonishment at her ability to so profoundly write about the cognitive development and experience of growing up female. She is amazing at depicting the anxiety, enjoyment, and disappointment of existing and changing at the same time. As an academic, I feel her experiences so greatly mirror mine, that it is almost like reading a play about my emotional life. I never want the book to end, because the satisfaction I get from reading about another woman with the same experience is amazing.

I also just finished an episode of Girls, and I am so overwhelmed with appreciation for Lena Dunham to have created a show that so honestly depicts the weirdness of being in your 20′s, of all the mistakes, and the often contradictory life  experiences that occur in lieu of one’s moral self.  I read somewhere that some feminists (which is a title I stand by) are commenting on how in the last episode, all the women used sex to gain power,  however I didn’t see that (only after reading their comments did I slightly see).

I think so often people try to analyze or claim meaning to an experience or show or book within the context of some absolute essentialist manner, “this is not feminist because… ” “All the women are using sex because, ” rather than commenting on the fact that maybe this is an actual account into the often muddy grey zone young women find themselves in. We can’t always keep our guard up, eagerly playing out the moral code of feminism, or some religion, or at least political correctness. Women and life are much more complex then that, and the second we try to essentialize the experience, we lose the point. To me it seems counter-feminist to minimize this show to “unfeminist rhetoric,” and by doing so we lose sight of the fact that this show is commenting on some women’s lives in a real way.

In any case, I am so thankful for de Beauvoir and Denham for gracing this earth with a raw account of the emotional, mental, and moral roller coster that is female.

 

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On Nose Piercings

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

So I want to get a nose piercing….big deal, right? Its the quintessential “woman activist” thing to do – stage a revolution, get a nose piercing (not necessarily in that order). Its like any other piercing, or a tattoo, or a streak of pink in my hair —so why can’t I stop thinking about it?

What is it about nose piercings? Originally, nose piercings were practiced in the Middle East amongst nomadic tribes who matched the size of the nose ring to the wealth of the family. The practice was brought to India by the moguls in the 1600’s, the context I associate nose piercings with the most. Fast-forwarding to the 1960s, nose piercings became all the rage in the Western world thanks to hippies who would travel to India on their “spiritual journeys” and come back with a stud in their nostrils. By the 1970’s, the history of nose piercings, particularly its association with a Western orientalist fascination with “spiritual” India, was lost, and it became a general sign of rebellion against conservative values, especially amongst people involved in the Punk movement. Gradually, the nose piercing’s association with the white liberals and leftists was diluted as celebrities and fashionably socially-conscious college women everywhere began donning them en masse.

I can’t ignore this history, as I think about poking a hole in my own nostril. Right now, it may seem like every 20-something year old female at a liberal arts school is opting for a nose piercing as a small statement of rebellion that is still fashionable, just the right amount of “noticeable”, and isn’t as much of a commitment as, say, a back tattoo. It may seem like today’s nose piercing is so far removed from that history of white hippies strolling in and out of India with unchecked privilege, bringing back with them a fashion statement, rather than any type of social awareness. Or is it? Personally, nose piercings don’t make me first think of picket signs and peace signs; rather my mind goes back to my own mother’s wedding pictures, and the delicate gold ring circling her nose. Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged | Leave a comment

Marriage Equality: Why Obama’s Words Matter

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Actions speak louder than words. This was the response of many gay rights activists in light of President Obama’s public endorsement of same-sex marriage. While it was a moving and courageous public stance on a socially charged issue, many proponents of marriage equality believed that the statement did very little in the legal nightmare revolving around the recognition of same-sex marriages at the federal level.

I disagree. Although late and obviously incomplete, it is necessary for a world leader at the President’s level to speak with conviction to a global audience on an issue that he and other politicians have dodged in a political dance with public opinion. He chose the medium of national television to deliver an announcement in his own words about why he believes that same-sex couples should have all the rights heterosexual couples enjoy. He cited his children, and how he would not know how to explain to them at the dinner table that the same-sex parents of their friends would be denied the same rights straight parents take for granted.

This is not just the fight for the title of “marriage.” Rarely is anyone I know aware that 1,138 rights are denied to gay couples because of their marital status. If you are heterosexual, take a minute to understand how you would feel if you were passed up for these benefits. Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

To the Queer Kids of America: Amendment One is a Form of Bullying

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Originally appeared on RoleReboot.org.

This letter is to all the queer kids, the gay, lesbian, and bi kids, to the young adults who identify as transgender, genderqueer, pansexual, and/or androgynous, to the questioning kids, to the kids who were born intersex, to the high school and college kids in North Carolina and around the country. This is to the elementary and junior high kids who are gender variant. This is to all the kids who don’t fall neatly into the categories of “man” or “woman” or whose sexual and/or affectional orientations aren’t exclusively toward someone who falls into the opposite neatly-defined category.

This week, a group of grown-ups voted overwhelmingly to use constitutional powers in the state of North Carolina to define marriage as between “one man and one woman.” These were no doubt many of the same grown-ups who for much of last year were all riled up about bullying in schools and teen suicide. As you probably know, the state had already used its constitution to ban “same-sex marriage.” Apparently it was not enough to stop gay folks from marrying, the voters of NC felt the need to be absolutely sure there would be no way you would share equal rights, through civil unions, or any other measure. Instead of democracy being utilized to protect minorities against hostile majorities, in this case, it is being used to legalize discrimination. If this was really about marriage and its meaning, why not stop at a marriage ban? This is bullying pure and simple.

When I was in high school, there was a rule that in order for a same-sex couple to attend the prom, they had to appear before the principal, “explain the nature of their relationship,” and get permission. According to wikipedia, bullying is a form of “aggressive behavior,” involving “intimidation or coercion” that is often characterized by an “imbalance of power.” Our school administration had more power than students, and was coercing same-sex couples not to attend the prom by setting up an intimidating situation. What high school couple, gay or straight, would feel comfortable having to explain “the nature of their relationship” to the high school principal? Grown-ups can bully kids as well as other kids. Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment
218 queries. 1.405 seconds