As much as it made me nauseous to read Kathleen Parker’s quotes in New York Times ‘ recent review of hers and Jessica Valenti’s new(ish) books, it made me even more ill to see that, yet again , gender politics have been relegated to the “Style”-”Fashion & Style” section. That section is also home to “Dining & Wine,” “Home & Garden,” “Weddings/Celebrations,” and “TMagazine.” The subheader to the review title “Endangered Species or Still the Enemy?” (because clearly gender is either akin to biological survival or war) is “Books of Style.”

Books of style? Gender issues have incredible political, economic, and social implications, and books discussing them are ‘books of style’? Seriously, WTF?! Or should I have expected this from a review that uses the antiquated and inaccurate term “battle of the sexes” to describe the problems these books address.

I may be going out on a limb here, but shouldn’t this book review be in, um, books ?

Dear New York Times ,

Book about gender issues are books. They are neither style nor fashion, lifestyle nor ‘non-news.’ They are not frivolous, expendable, or irrelevant. Gender studies texts are important, provocative, meaningful, and essential books .

Please list them in the “Books” section.

Sincerely,

lindabeth

3

You recommended

5 Comments

July 14, 2008 2:05 AM

[0+]  becca b said:

Brief, but thorough, and right on target.

Cheers to you!

I  Liked  Liked this comment  |  Reply |

July 14, 2008 3:05 AM

[0+]  whatsername said:

OMG that pisses me off too!

I  Liked  Liked this comment  |  Reply |

July 14, 2008 3:06 AM

[0+]  Hilary said:

Thank you.

NYT has a bad habit of putting many women's issues in the Style section. Their article about MomsRising and income inequalities was in there instead of in the business section, and there has also been articles about women's health there instead of in the Health section.

I  Liked  Liked this comment  |  Reply |

July 14, 2008 11:13 AM

[0+]  colleen said:

I definitely agree. It seems that any book written by a woman, regardless of content, is almost always buried in the "Lifestyles" portion of a newspaper. With the exception of a few political reporters who have come out with books in the last couple years, anything related to women is automatically a "Lifestyle" staple...

I  Liked  Liked this comment  |  Reply |

July 14, 2008 3:31 PM

[0+]  LaurenS said:

In The Toronto Star Antonia Zerbisias, a fantastic feminist columnist, always appears in the Living section despite writing about topics that belong in the front section.

She recently did a piece about Jessica's new book actually.

Link to her blog: http://thestar.blogs.com/broadsides/

I  Liked  Liked this comment  |  Reply |

Leave a comment

Comments (You may use HTML tags for style)