Does anyone else know about this? At the Beijing Olympic Games, if officials cannot determine that a female athlete is not a male, she must undergo 'sex determination.' This has apparently been going on for quite some time. Today, the New York Times reports that the lab is ready for sex testing in China.
Experts at the lab, located at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, will evaluate cases based on their external appearance and take blood samples to test hormones, genes and chromosomes, said Prof. Tian Qinjie of the college hospital, according to the Xinhua news agency.In 1999, the International Olympic Committee revised the testing to only occur when the female athletes sex was suspected to be male rather than every athlete who competed. The test being carried out in Beijing is the same that has been used in previous games.Gender verification tests emerged in the 1960s when Communist countries in Eastern Europe were thought to be using male athletes in women's competitions. The tests were used at the Olympics for the first time at the 1968 Mexico City Games.
The test aims to maintain fairness of the Games, and to rule out inaccurate test results.That is quite a large number. Why is it that so many female athletes cannot 'pass' gender tests? The Wikipedia offers some of the controversies:Experts say test results for about one in 500 to 600 athletes are abnormal.
The practice has come under fire from those that feel that the testing is humiliating, socially insensitive, and not entirely accurate or effective anyway. The testing is especially difficult and problematic in the case of people who could be considered intersexual. The genetic tests provide potentially inaccurate results and discriminate against women with disorders of sexual development. Genetic anomalies can allow a person to have a male genetic make-up but be physiologically female.I feel as if Judith Butler would have an excellent analysis of this phenomenon. There have apparently been many individuals over the years who have run into trouble with their gender and these absurd tests and have had their medals taken away. Wiki makes a point - what about intersexuals? What about people with ambiguous genitalia? Why is this even an issue? I want so badly to discuss why we have separated the olympics into this bullshit gender/sex binary that just plain-and-simple does not work or separate people into 'boy' and 'girl.' Thoughts?
A commentary published in the Journal of the American Medical Association stated,
"gender verification tests are difficult, expensive, and potentially inaccurate. Furthermore, these tests fail to exclude all potential impostors (eg, some 46,XX males), are discriminatory against women with disorders of sexual development, and may have shattering consequences for athletes who 'fail' a test."The article also states:
"Gender verification has long been criticized by geneticists, endocrinologists, and others in the medical community. One major problem was unfairly excluding women who had a birth defect involving gonads and external genitalia (i.e., male pseudohermaphroditism).
A second problem is that only women, not men, were stigmatized by gender verification testing. Systematic follow-up was rarely available for female athletes "failing" the test, which often was performed under very public circumstances. Follow-up was crucial because the problem was not male impostors, but rather confusion caused by misunderstanding of male pseudohermaphroditism."


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Sex Determination at Olympics.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/8254











Weekly Feministing Newsletter
Feministing RSS Feed
I want even more to make a "Genderfucked Olymics". I think I'd call it that too.
I'm also glad that I got off the Olympic team due to a serious injury. Well, the serious injury sucked, but I'm happy to know now that I don't have to deal with Professional Sports and gender identity on top of all the other bs anyone who doesn't fit into clear bio/genetical male/female categories has to deal with.
"Why is this even an issue?"
The version of the rumor I heard is that it's not about athletes who "appear female" because they're transwomen, intersex, ciswomen who have XY chromosomes and complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (hence being born with vaginas despite their Y chromosomes), etc. but about some regular cismen with unambiguous male genitalia who didn't happen to have any personal-sexual-identity reasons to want to "appear female" supposedly taking hormones to "appear female" for sports reasons (that is, to compete against women instead of against other men and have a higher chance of winning medals for their nations). I wouldn't be surprised if the rumor was Cold War propaganda against Warsaw Pact coaches instead of based in fact.
The first time I heard about this was when a friend of mine told me that Jamie Lee Curtis was xy, so that if she ever joined the Olympics she would have to compete as a man.
Does this have a history in other Olympics (I don't trust Wikipedia for issues of feminism, many of the editors believe sexism is no longer a problem)? Or am I wrong in wondering who the fuck gave China the Olympics for this year, and why do they want to support a government that's so fucked up?
The entire point of the Olympics is that international politics are put aside. The conflict between democracy and autocracy didn't stop the Athenians and the Spartans from competing in the Olympics, so it shouldn't stop us either.
nightingale commented at July 30, 2008 1:21 AM: "Or am I wrong in wondering who the fuck gave China the Olympics for this year"
Maybe the same organization that gave Germany the Olympics for 1936?
There's a fabulous discussion of this in Sexing the Body by Anne Fausto-Sterling. It's actually just a great book all the way around.
"The entire point of the Olympics is that international politics are put aside."
That statement ignores much of the history of the Olympics since they have been revived in more modern times, especially in the most recent decades. We could argue it is the "point," but that would be missing the significant and compelling reality that that has almost never been the case.