Originally posted at http://jmwinck.wordpress.com
For a moment I couldn’t believe that I had to take this seriously. John McCain chooses a woman as his vice presidential nominee. It didn’t take long to realize what was at stake. Roe v. Wade: gone. Exceptions for those who were raped or victims of incest: gone. More attacks against birth control. What it means to be a woman, reconceptualized in that narrow, traditional frame. She can have five kids. She snagged a man who accepts her success. She is a governor. What are other women whining about?
I want to see the nanny in that wonderful family picture. If Palin is “a woman’s candidate,” I want her to explain what poor women should do when they get pregnant and still want to go to school, or become governor. I want her to address class and race when it comes to growing your family and building your career. If she doesn’t, I will have to believe that she has a simple answer. Don’t be poor. Be rich like I am.
Or, be the partner of someone who faces no discrimination based on class, skin color, gender, or sexuality. Have children with this person, only after marriage. And when you want to do something that fulfills you, hire someone to take care of your home and your kids. It’s that simple to Palin.
Palin as the Republican vice presidential candidate is more than frustrating. It’s confusing, irritating, condescending, disrespectful. She is against the feminist concept of considering all women, their partners and their families, yet calls herself a feminist. On one hand, she would gladly deny women the health care, education, and reproductive rights they are owed. On the other, when she talks about progress for women, she herself is suddenly breaking some glass ceiling, or satisfying that feminist desire to see women in respected positions. I am sensing an alteration of feminism where Senator Clinton’s campaign left off: the installation of women in a limited number of power positions.
The popularity of this definition of feminism was and is misleading. Feminism is also the means through which we will win universal health care, reproductive justice, economic security. It is an enthusiastic encouragement, if not a bridge, to other fights against injustice. Limited to white women who want social equality with their male counterparts, this feminism fails terribly. Until the desires of the privileged stop trumping the real needs of everyone else, feminism will continue to be hijacked by anti-feminist women who love the benefits of being patriarchy’s little sister
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Sarah Palin: Patriarchy's Happy Little Sister.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/9064
Weekly Feministing Newsletter
Feministing RSS Feed
I agree with everything you've said, but I have one minor quibble. I think her husband may be a native Alaskan, which would indicate that he may lack privilege is some ways of his own.
The NYT has a fascinating article about how Sarah Palin's blue collar prosperity can't exist outside of Alaska. Realistically, most states couldn't function with a negative income tax like Alaska's. In most states, someone with only a high school degree couldn't pull down $100,000 a year, like Palin's husband does, etc. I wish I could find the article...
Clothilde--
He's at least part Yu'pik, Palin mentions this fact frequently. He looks white to me, but perhaps a person who was more familiar with the Yu'pik would be able to identify him as being one of them. (For example, it is sometimes difficult for Americans to identify who is and is not Sami, a particular ethnicity in northern Norway and Finland. But Norwegians can tell. When reading about the oppression of the Roma in Europe, I could not tell which people were Roma and which were not. But apparently Europeans can.)
Not only all that but Her husband works for BP or did anyway. BP = British Petroleum. Also McCain's party has received millions and millions of dollars of oil employees money over Obama's party. Also according to experts McCain's tax cuts or whatever he wants to call it are for the rich, big businesses, and the oil companies. According to experts his plan won't effect like 100 million Americans.