http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Pat says, say "no" to Amendment 48, Colorado.

My boss, former Colorado congresswoman Pat Schroeder, wrote this Op-Ed for a newspaper in Colorado, urging citizens from her home state to reject Amendment 48, a motion to criminalize abortion and other forms of birth control.

She writes "Years ago, when I was asked how I could be both a mother and a Congresswoman, I replied, "I have a brain and a uterus and I use both."

On Nov. 4, I urge Coloradans to use their brains and protect women's uteruses. Vote no on Amendment 48."

ROCK ON.

There was also an interesting segment on NPR this morning about a similar ballot initiative in South Dakota - so infuriating. A state with 600,000 people could reopen the debate on the constitutionality of legalized abortions.

P.S. Read the readers comments only if you want to be enraged.

Posted by acacia.oconnor - October 27, 2008, at 02:30PM | in Reproductive Rights
4

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Pat says, say "no" to Amendment 48, Colorado..

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/10088

4 Comments

[0+] Author Profile Page gopher said:

I voted yesterday AGAINST this stupid amendment. I can only hope a majority did as well!

That's awesome. We actually distributed that op-ed for Ms. Schroeder and she was nice enough to allow us to film her reading a part of her op-ed for a video. You can see the video of Pat here.

[0+] Author Profile Page Richard Myers said:

I voted no on 48. I'm also concerned about 47, which is aimed directly at working people.

Here's a site with info about Amendment 47:

http://www.voteno47.com

And, a site with info about Amendments 47, 49, and 54, which are also aimed at working people:

http://www.protectcoloradosfuture.org/

This is kind of a shot in the dark, but I distantly recall reading that some Islamic law traditions forbid women to wear adornments that make distinctive noises--traditionally, bracelets and anklets with bells or jingling charms. The only time this was considered acceptable was when a woman was alone with her husband. The sensory stimulation was considered seduction, and therefore suitable bedroom furniture only for the bedroom.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
About Feministing Community
Feministing Community is a forum for a variety of feminist voices and organizations.
Related Posts
Related Feministing Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Take Back the Night Miami University
    Monday, 6 April 2009 08:30 PM to 10:00 PM
    Shriver Reflecting Pool
    Oxford, OH
  • Athens Annual Take Back the Night
    Thursday, 9 April 2009 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM
    Tate Plaza
    Athens, GA
  • Darfur Benefit Concert at The Duplex in NYC
    Thursday, 9 April 2009 06:30 PM to 09:00 PM
    The Duplex
    New York, NY
  • Jessica Valenti: The Purity Myth
    Thursday, 9 April 2009 07:00 PM to 08:00 PM
    Miami University Shriver Multipurpose Room
    Oxford, OH
  • 4/9 Staceyann Chin (St. Louis: Left Bank Books)
    Thursday, 9 April 2009 07:00 PM to 01:00 AM
    Mad Art Gallery
    St. Louis, MO




Recent Community Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing