Reclaiming the Word Bitch

The other day, a male classmate of mine tried to "sum up" feminism. We were discussing sexist advertisments, like those for men's body wash and stuff. I first stated that I think the ad's are very demeaning to women. He goes, "Why because they show girls being easy?" (WTF! No, it's MUCH more than that!) So I replied, "No, its a much more complex analysis of men and masculinities, objectification of women, sexism, society's perception of gender, and the impact of the media." Apparently I am not allowed to "sound smart" about the things I am passionate about, because he said:

"Some feminists take it a bit too far. The whole idea is to make men and women equals, but feminists boost their status by bringing down men's status by being bitches."(WTF!?!?)

I got SOOO pissed off because:
1. Feminism is not about that at all!
2. I hate when people use the word bitch! and
3. I am a feminist but I don't hate men at all! That would just counteract the whole movement, would it not?

I called him out and said, "No, its bullshit that people take feminism as a joke because it's about working for equality for everyone regardless of gender race sex or class - it has nothing to do with hating men, it actually benefits them too!"

He appologized and said he didn't mean to offend me. But I was still pissed off. So I'm a man-hating "bitch" because I believe in working for equality for everyone? I'm a bitch because I don't stand for sexism? I'm a bitch because I can make an intelligent statement or defend my opinion in class? It's bullshit.

So I decided to reclaim the word bitch. Ispired by Kathleen Hanna's reclaiming of the word "slut," I wrote "Bitch" on my wrist with marker. 

People call women bitches when they show power or "sound smart" or don't give in. If that's the case, then I am a bitch and I am proud! I am making the word my own.

I have an image that I wanted to post along with this, but I can't figure out how. Regardless, I needed to rant/share this story. Thanks Feministing for listening!

Posted by lt64855n - November 08, 2008, at 10:15PM | in Language
3

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Reclaiming the Word Bitch.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/10342

19 Comments

You know, it always bothers me that men, because of their own privilege, perceive any advancement in women's rights as an attack on their rights. The key in what is going on here with this male class mate is when he says this: "The whole idea is to make men and women equals, but feminists boost their status by bringing down men's status"

I'm sure all the feminists here caught that...Here's a quote from the "feminism 101" blog that explains this attitude further (perhaps your male classmate should read it):

"[T]rue gender equality is actually perceived as inequality. A group that is made up of 50% women is perceived as being mostly women. A situation that is perfectly equal between men and women is perceived as being biased in favor of women."

"And if you don’t believe me, you’ve never been a married woman who kept her family name. I have had students hold that up as proof of my "sexism". My own brother told me that he could never marry a woman who kept her name because everyone would know who ruled that relationship. Perfect equality - my husband keeps his name and I keep mine is held as a statement of "superiority" on my part.

[Lucy, When Worlds Collide: Fandom and Male Privilege.]

"In this case the inequality is perceived, in part, because taking one’s husband’s name is considered "normal" for a woman, whereas choosing to keep one’s own name deviates from that. Popular culture often labels this behavior as emasculating to a man, but never bothers to question how a woman might feel being asked to give up something that has been part of her since her birth. This is an example of a culture of male privilege where a man’s position and feelings are placed above that of the woman’s in a way that is seen as normal, natural, and traditional."

Going back to Lucy’s article, this is what she said in the paragraph directly preceding the one quoted above:

"Male privilege may be more obvious in other cultures, but in so-called Western culture it’s still ubiquitous. In fact, it’s so ubiquitous that it’s invisible. It is so pervasive as to be normalized, and so normalized as to be visible only in its absence. The vast, vast, vast majority of institutions, spaces, and subcultures privilege male interests, but because male is the default in this culture, such interests are very often considered ungendered. As a result, we only really notice when something privileges female interests."

Sorry to cut and paste all that text, but I felt is described perfectly what was going on in the case of this male classmate.

So it's obvious that this classmate is only talking from his own male privileged perspective.

Here's the link if you want to give it to him...but I sort of have a hard time picturing him being amenable to evaluating and exposing his own male privilege given his statements to you.

http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/03/11/faq-what-is-male-privilege/

[0+] Author Profile Page lizkis said:

Yeah, that would have seriously pissed me off too. Since when do feminists "bring down men's statuses" by being bitches?! So, if we're opinionated and passionate about something, that means we're bitches? That is utter bullshit.

The only reason that we even have to work for equality for everyone is because the middle-to-upper class white males insist that they be number one in everything. And if we try to even come close to that status, then that means they're less powerful and they can't stand that. That shouldn't mean that they have to come and rag on the feminists trying to make the world a better place. It should mean that they have to realize that they're NOT all-powerful, that they SHOULDN'T control the lives of everyone else, and that maybe, for once, they should admit that they've been wrong for a long, long time.

end rant...lol

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT said:

It's interesting how you say you want equality, but the site is called feministing... that's slightly unequal. It makes it a site for women?
And it's also interesting how you say he can only see it from his 'male perspective' but you don't seem to have respected his opinion in the least, merely ranted somewhere where you know you'll only get support and not confrontation. A place where you could say pretty much anything without any evidence to your point of view, but goes readily accepted.
Maybe if you want equality, you should call the site humanisting. Where everyone in the world can all scream about their troubles and blame it on everyone else without actually taking responsibility whatsoever for their own actions.
Atleast in that respect, everyone gets the chance to make useless comments.

[0+] Author Profile Page nightingale replied to intelliGENT :

Actually, it's a site for feminists. "Feminist" is non-gender-specific, although many people do associate it with women because it was women who first starting caring about gender disparities, and many men don't participate in the movement now because men benefit most from the current system. But nice try.

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT replied to nightingale :

The downsides to writing a long post is that you can choose to only attack one part of it and completely ignore anything else. And you're obviously forgetting that your quest is one against a purely psychological thing, a situation which is only apparent in the minds of the people. It isnt an object that can be carved or reshaped, put purely an idea of where you think you stand in relation to men. Something where you'll always believe that you've been wronged in a feminist way if a man wins.

I am curious where this all ends? And what level that everything should be made purely equal. Should we all for example have a penis and a vagina? Should everybody lactate? Should men be allowed multiple orgasms? Can men hit women?

To create the kind of balance of equality that you seem to strive for, would mean that everyone would have to have exactly the same of everything, every person would be completely identical and there would be no competition. The human race would simply die because there would be no evolution, no diversity, no good, and no bad. Everything would be beige.

The irony is, you're using your freedom to argue for equality, which in turn will have new laws brought in to permit your passage to where you want to be, but with that, your freedoms will be reduced even further.

[0+] Author Profile Page Morgan replied to intelliGENT :

While equality means having the same rights, it has nothing to do with all of us being the same. That's like saying that in order to have equality among races we must not recognize that some groups have different pigments and customs. It's not about becoming completely blind to eachother's differences it should be more about embracing them, and not letting those Cultural, physical, sexual, etc etc differences effect what we have equal to such as healthcare, good education, and fair pay.

[0+] Author Profile Page Audrey said:

Bitch, slut and whore are words that get used against women who are smart, successful, beautiful,empowered etc because they are all things we are not supposed to be. This to me means 2 things 1) Feminists must be doing something right- the more insults and reaction you get must mean we are going in the right direction if we are bringing these neanderthal reactions to the surface, proving we're right 2) every time I get called a bitch, I say thank you, I take it as compliment.

[0+] Author Profile Page Yoshimi replied to Audrey :

I agree. When my friends and I joke about being whores and bitches we're pointing out the irony that women who are nice people and responsible about sex get labled bitches for having (gasp) opinions and for not denying the fact that we have sex lives.

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT replied to Audrey :

Bitch, slut and whore are also words that get used against women who are, crack addicts, whores, murders and women who let their children be neglected. I'm not sure that's the best example to set.

[0+] Author Profile Page Morgan replied to intelliGENT :

also these terms are used for these women because that's what a predominently patriarchal society applies to these women. Instead of helping them socially they alienate them.

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT replied to Audrey :

I'd also like to thank everybody who's given me negative feedback, because by Audrey's logic. It must mean im smart, successful, beautiful and empowered. So thanks again :)

[0+] Author Profile Page gopher said:

Fuck off intelliGENT

Troll alert

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT replied to gopher :

That is your comment? After the entire post is about "neanderthal reactions". You've proved my point evidently. You are indeed the pot calling the kettle black.

[0+] Author Profile Page Morgan replied to intelliGENT :

well if you check the etymology of all of these words... they all started out as POSITIVE words describing women. If you read the book Cunt by Inga Musico, a cunt was a woman who was highly regarded in society, as a priestess or even more powerful. These words got turned around by a patriarchal society. So just remember that everytime you get called a bitch or slut, it's nothing more than a word that became twisted around by society even more ass-backwards....

[0+] Author Profile Page chris g said:

So, I've got a bit of a reaction and then also maybe a misguided attempt at finding a silver lining.

1)As a male, it is easy to say "hey i just want things to be equal---not to go to far and take away men's freedoms!" It is easy to say because we males have never been on the receiving end of SYSTEMATIC oppression, so making things "equal" without doing the hard work of examining our own attitudes and beliefs, and those of society that led us to an "unequal" situation in the first place is NOT equality--it is whitewashing over the past. We cannot and will not have a more just society without first examining and eradicating what perpetuates injustice in the first place.

Ironically, intelliGENT, if and when we do this--we examine and uproot the (usually invisible and to us men often "harmless") attitudes that one finds in both one's own life and in the media/society at large we actually help BUILD a more just, equal society and that benefits men too.

(although, as an aside, if eradicating sexist AXE bodywash commercials takes away from my "status" as a man, dear lord, my gender is in even sorrier shape than I ever could have imagined)

2)meenecat, keep up the good work! We can't realistically expect to shift people's perceptions all the way overnight, but bringing up items like you did--dialoguing with people on tough questions even when it seems hopeless believe it or not can change people's minds incrementally until one day they actually have come around.

[0+] Author Profile Page Morgan said:

lt good for you!!!! and its a good thing u set him straight and made him see your point of view. I'm not sure i would have made it that far... i would have yelled "sexist pig!" haha. In my women's studies class a few weeks ago we read a chapter from Inga Musico's book Cunt, entitled "rape not cunts" some of the girls were uncomfortable saying the word itself, and we took a pretty good portion of the class discussing the connotations behind words such as cunt and how we view them. Then everyone said it... outloud, it was very empowering.

[0+] Author Profile Page Lauren T replied to Morgan :

Thanks Morgan! It is so frustrating that the definition of feminism gets misconstrued (through media, society, patriarchy etc) and then people don't understand it.

And yes, I am a bitch - I am smart, powerful, opinionated, and not afraid to stand up for my beliefs! So here's to all the fabulous bitches out there!

[0+] Author Profile Page intelliGENT said:

At what point do you renounce all logic and reason just to say that you are protecting your beliefs?

I dont think you're a support of feminism at all, I think feminism supports that you dont have to change YOUR view!

So far on this site I havent heard a single comment from anyone who's willing to find a middle ground where everyone is beneficial. Purely 1 sided view, that is as hypocritical as a male run world. You're not acting on the ideology of an equal world, you're just another side doing exactly the same thing. And the worst part about it, is you're not actually smart enough to realize it.

[0+] Author Profile Page Lauren T replied to intelliGENT :

I completely disagree. Feminism is not about acting on "another side" - it's about breaking down those binaries. Words are very important and the way they are used in our society to describe one side of a binary or the other (ie: bitch) can show a lot about our cultures unwillingness to remove such binaries. I think reclaiming a word is a great thing to do. It doesn't have to be "bitch," it could be anything: fat, ugly, innocent, slut, whore, etc.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
About Feministing Community
Feministing Community is a forum for a variety of feminist voices and organizations.
Related Posts
Related Feministing Posts
Recent Community Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing
Weekly Feministing Newsletter