I know feminists devote a lot of energy and time to thinking about how people have a tendency to "gender" things (and why they shouldn't be at all) but this last week, I sort of got a short introduction into what may be the hardest things we have when it comes to un-genendering...
our names.
As I've said before, my parents have 5 girls. Now, my name is quite sterotypically female, as is the name of my next sister. The 10 year old, however, is named Wesley Ray. My mother picked the name for a very dear (male) friend of hers who passed less than a week before the birth, and she thought it would be nice. My youngest sister is named after my father's police partner, who was wounded while assisting him in a call, and her name is Corey. In between them is Wren (after the bird) and Quinn (which is a very Irish name). Now all these names are not traditionally female, to be sure. If you heard Wesley and Corey spoken, you'd might assume they were male, and Wren and Quinn, well, you may not know what gender those people were.
I just get extremely tired of people who, upon meeting our family, find it prudent to exclaim "I thought you were a boy!" or "Why does a little girl like you have a little boy's name?" And then the kid gets stuck trying to explain why they have the name they do. Wesley got stuck with a blue name tag in preschool on the first day, because the teacher assumed anyone with that name was male, and it sort of irked her.
I understand that we come from a society that has specific "boy" and girl" names, and it seems like we are not meant to deviate from the set-our parameters, but it gets under my skin! I am starting to become of the opinion that strictly adhering to "boy" and "girl" names isn't such a great idea and maybe we'd be better off if we could just name our children what we truly felt reflected on us best and what "fit" them the most! Granted, I think even I would be a bit taken aback were I to meet a woman named Mikey or Dan or Stevie or something to that effect, but I would do my best to get over it quickly and just move on.
So, are there any women out there who have a traditionally "masculine name" or have given a non-gender conforming name to one of their own? I'm really interested in hearing thoughts on the topic, since I have not met a great number of people in this situation before. Should we just, as a society, get over gendered names and move on, or do you think the confusion would be too great if we did?


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: So What's In A (Boy or Girl) Name?.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/10653
















Oh, I love this post...this is something that I've always thought about but never really talked about with anyone. I always personally love gender neutral names, names that don't have a definition of being either male or female. Alex, Elliot, Dale, Jaime, Riley, Teagan...there's many many more, but those names come to mind because I have family member or friends with the names and have known people both male and female that share some of these names.
I agree, it would be great if, for example if Allie could be both a girl or boy name, and Stevie could be both a girl and boy name. I know it might sound weird to some at first, but I think this is only because we are not used to seeing girls named "Stevie" and boys named "Allie"...but what if all of a sudden there were girls named Stevie and boys names Allie? Would our ideas of these names change? I bet they would!...Challenging gender roles and norms means thinking outside of the box and rethinking our perceptions of certain societal norms. I think rethinking our notions of traditional male and female names would be a great thing.
"I know it might sound weird to some at first, but I think this is only because we are not used to seeing girls named 'Stevie' and boys named 'Allie'"
I'm used to hearing boys named "Allie," because "Ali" and "Allie" sound the same.
As an aside, I think I'm horrified that the preschool teacher put little boys on blue nametags and little girls on pink ones to begin with.
Abby, it's frustrating to think about, but I know a lot of schools treat boys and girls this way. i.e. there's the "boys line" and the "girls line", there's princess stickers given to girls and thomas the train stickers for boys. There's all the gendered toys for girls and gendered toys for boys. There's classroom jobs divided up into "boy jobs" and "girl jobs". There's even sections of classroom libraries with "girl books" and "boy books"...It's horrifying that these things are enforced from such a young age by our schools...I know because I'm a teacher and I see this stuff all the time, although I'm not perfect, I try to stay away from as much gender stereotyping as possible. It actually doesn't surprise me that the teacher did the whole "pink=girl" and "blue=boy" name tag thing for the students.
That's a bit creepy. I don't remember that kind of stuff happening when I was a kid. I mean, there were gendered toys and kids seemed to gravitate toward the ones they were "supposed to", but I don't remember it being forced on us like that.
It may also have to do with regional differences as well as class differences.
Also, it's not that there is specific labels on the shelves that say "boys" and "girls" things...it's just for example, in my school, some teachers will organize the books or toys by what they think girls will read/play with and what boys will read/play with by the idea that this will make it easier for boys and girls to find books and toys that interest them. Sections with trucks, cars, planes, cowboys, superheros, etc. and sections with princesses, ponies, cute animals, and books all about these stereotypical boy and girl things...without specifically calling it "girl toys/books" and "boy toys/books" it's just sort of implied given the stereotypical content of the selection.
With regard to the lines, it's sad, but the school actually enforces this policy. All the teachers have to do it. So students end up sitting separated by boys and girls at lunch and at assemblies.
Also, I should clarify, I didn't mean to imply that there are separate lists for boy jobs and girl jobs, but I have frequently seen teachers only give certain jobs to boys based on stereotypes, A] On the idea that boys are stronger - even though there's no difference in strength between a 1st/2nd/3rd grade boy and a 1st/2nd/3rd grade girl. For example "textbook passer-outer" would most always be a boy (because supposedly he would be better at carrying heavy items)...B] Or the person who holds open the doors for everyone during a fire drill are more often then not assigned to boys. (again, the whole connection between men holding doors and chivalry, i.e. it's "nice" when boys/men hold doors for others, mainly other women.) C] And, interestingly enough, I see boys more than girls, assigned to sweeping and making sure all the trash ends up in the can (cleaning), because in schools, sweeping, mopping, garbage collecting etc. are seen as a custodial (men's) job. And school custodians are overwhelmingly male.
Most often I see the job thing play out where girls end up being kept from doing certain jobs that they might have an interest in doing, however it's always been assigned to boys. To be fair a lot of teachers in my school do have good job assignment rules. Basically everyone gets to try doing each job at least once, and you just rotate the students names around the list until everyone has tried each job at least once.
Oh, sorry for the ramble, this comment was long.
Unfortunately I don't think it's regional at all. Our daycare is totally like that, and the teachers act either bewildered or put upon when we ask that they let our 4 y/o choose a Thomas or Princess sticker, a blue or pink tag, etc. And this is rated as the best preschool in town, I kid you not.
I am elated to learn you are in charge of young people's education and I hope there are many other teachers like you out there.
This is an issue for me, too, although rather more subtly--my name is Alexius, which is always assumed to be a woman's name, but is in fact male-gendered (such as Cassius, Julius, et cetera). My mom always gets defensive whenever I remind her of that, even though I like my name and try to convince her that it doesn't matter to me that it's technically a masculine name. Sometimes when people tell me I have a pretty name I'll reply with "Thanks! Actually it's a masculine name though," and then they tend to go silent and look apologetic even though I'm clearly not upset by it at all and in fact enjoy it immensely. Ultimately I prefer having a name like Alexius; when I call myself by it I feel both that it's a pretty and a powerful name to have.
Be that as it may, you'll realize that it is far more common to have women with male/ambigious sounding names, rather than men with female sounding names. For example, while the chances of meeting a woman with the name of Alex, or Corey, is still quite high, you'd be hard pressed to find a man named Jennifer, Alice or Sonia. The former, while it may seem novel now and again, seems more acceptable to us than the latter.
There was a chapter in Freakonomics that dealt wih this. It detailed how, over time, more and more women took up what were historically male names, but that the reverse did not happen, ie. men did not seem to be taking up what were historically women's names. This trend is continuing until today, such that men have a smaller and smaller pool of names with which they are given.
My little brother was given a name that was originally male but has become associated with girls in the last 30-40 years. (It's an unusual name, even for a girl, and I'd prefer to protect his privacy so you'll just have to guess.) It has confused quite a few people who heard his name, thought he would be a girl, and then found out he was actually a boy. I always wondered if he would change it when he got older to make it more "masculine" but he's an opinionated teenager now and still hasn't.
I discovered in anthropology lectures that Inupiat (inuit) culture have completely non-gendered names. I think that's cool.
Nice!
Drahill,
I love your thoughts on names. I love unusual names, and I'm glad my parents gave me something that wasn't popular at the time I was named.
As a teacher, though, I see the other side of it. It can be embarrassing. In my grade book I write M or F next to names that I'm not sure about. That way, I don't look for a male Alex or Devin when I need to look for a female one. This year I called a parent, "Jay," Mr. when it should have been Ms. in an email. (I'm SO careful about parent's last names and Mr./Mrs./Ms.)
By high school (where I teach), kids with unusual names usually know the deal by then. I would recommend making a mark when registering for school (M or F). I would recommend for teachers to print out the gender of their students with the class lists.
I would like some suggestions on how to handle a trans student. I have not had any who are open about it... and in my district, LGBTQ issues have been a hotbutton this year.
Trans-students should be called his/her preferred gender.
I find names and their history fascinating.
Giving girls boys' names is not new and is extremely popular at the moment, especially in America.
The 5th most popular girls name in 2007 in the USA was Madison, a male name meaning 'son of Maud'. Of the top 100 girls' names 18 of them were originally male names.
I think the sexism is more in the way it's justified as 'cute' or 'strong' to give a girl a boy's name but people would be horrified if you gave a boy a girl's name.
If you want to be different call a boy Ashley or Aubrey before they go the way of Shelley and Lindsay.
I have a crush on a guy whose name is Erin. Not Aaron, Erin. When I told my mom about this, her reaction was (of course) "But that's a girl's name!"
Then again, when I told her that he likes to bake, she asked if he was gay . . . sheesh.
With my name, it may not seem like any confusion could arise from people, but quite often it happens.
In writing, my name is clearly 'feminine', D-a-w-n; but phonetically the bulk of people hear D-o-n. A few things happen here when someone meets me and has commentary on my name: 1)"I had a [teacher, uncle, boss, etc] with that name, I'm surprised someone like you has such a masculine name!" 2)"D-o-n, right?" 3)"Is that short for Donna?"
It's hard not to express my frustration with these people, why is my name so hard to be imagined as the sunrise spelling and not a mistake of my parents? I know it's not so common for my generation (believe me, I've actually never met anyone younger than 35 with my name), but it's a known name! When I correct people on the spelling, they tend to ask of it's the feminine version of Don or Donald... "No", I say... "Actually 'Dawn' has been around centuries longer than Donald and originates from a different country, they just sound similar."
It's amazing to me that people are baffled that a feminine name with similar phonetics to another isn't a derivative of the masculine name.
My brother (who is in his forties) had a girlfriend named Dawn (also in her forties) so there is at least one Dawn out there over 35! I should ask her if she has had similar name issues.
And I didn't read closely enough. Sorry about that.
But, I went to high school with a girl name Dawn, and she's about 23 now. So works either way.
I knew a married couple named Dawn and Don. Most people say them the same way, but we had to learn to pronounce them differently to avoid confusion. Because I trained myself to hear them and say them differently, they don't sound like the same name to me anymore. Most people just aren't as concerned with it though and will continue to make flubs.
People sometimes assume I am male because my name (Rene') is spelled the "boy way" and then they wonder if I was named after Rene' Descartes or some other famous Frenchmen, when I have a feeling my parents just didn't want to bother with all those e's in the "girl way" (Renee').
Maybe it's just a Chicago accent, but I've always heard Dawn pronounced Dawn and Don pronounced Dahn. Just goes to show you that there IS a Chicago accent ;-)
Rosella, my dad's name is Ashley, and he's gotten quite a few perplexed looks in his lifetime, so it does goes both ways.
One of the things I find fascinating about boys; names now is that there is now sort of a "railing against" of what I've heard described as "soft" boys' names. A lot of popular boys' names today are very old, like Tristan, Declan, and the like. I sort of think this is due in part to the fact that there seem to be a lot of boy names out there than girls' names, which seem to be given more leeway. But you seem to assume that my post was talking about women who have male names exclusively. I think the post was pretty clear that parents of children (regardless of gender) should be allowed to name their children as they see fit.
Also, names and their gender assignments vary across cultures. My male cousin, who is German, has the name Jan (German pronounciation is Yan). I can tell you when people first meet him, many are expecting a woman. But that only happens in this country, whereas in Germany, the name is accepted as male. So it depends on where you happen to be. In England, naming a boy Lindsey or Ashley wouldn't be subversive at all or unusual, whereas here, it would be. When I wrote this piece, I was coming from the American viewpoint, though other ethnicities and nationalities probably have their own gendered names as well.
As far as teachers go, yeah, there will be times when confusion may happen. As far as I go (and I have a name that I have always considered female, but some don't), I think the best thing teachers can do would be to make an effort to make their classrooms as un-gendered as possible. Yeah, I think the idea of different color name tags or separate toys and the like are bad ideas overall. When I have come across a name of a person where I truly cannot be sure of the gender, sometimes I find it best to simply as the person what they like to be addressed as (and it usually makes them feel better). When it happens that I make a mistake in addressing someone's gender, I apologize, and usually, that remedies the situation (and most people who this happens to understand that their name may be androgynous and will accept the apology). These may not work work for everyone, it's just what I learned to do.
An aside, I've also noticed that often, an androgynous or masculine name will get "feminized" by changing the spelling, like with my name (that is consider to be very feminine). My name is Adrian (spelled that way) to honor one of my Greek relatives. I have been told many times that I have the "boy's spelling" and the girl's spelling is "Adrianne," even tho no such spelling exists in the Greek and "Adrian" itself is considered by the Greeks to fit either gender. Ugh.
We actually had Declan picked out for a boy name, but only because you never hear it in the States and we were looking for really uncommon names. We ended up with Quinn or Eliot for either, and she turned out to be a girl. Lots of people think she must be a boy on paper, but we're really not that concerned about it, and dress her in a gender-neutral way most of the time as well.
My name is Aubrey, which is such an uncommon name in the US that nobody even considers that it's traditionally a man's name. I really love my name, and the fact that it can be used for either gender is a plus.
I've always thought of my name as non-gendered but as a lot of people assume it is gendered feminine. It's an unusual name - I've met two other people (one male, one female) with the same name in my whole life and heard of about two more (both female) who were friends of friends of friends. (It's rare enough that I don't want to say what it is because I want to retain some degree of anonymity here.) But I think unusual names tend to have a greater amount of flexibility.
That said, if I ever had a girl, I would name her Anne after my grandmother. A boy named 'Anne' would get way too much harassment over it - like "A Boy Named Sue"! As much as I love the idea of removing the gender from names, I also wouldn't want to subject my kid to that kind of harassment.
And therein, I think, lies the problem, and the reason why I don't think we're going to see massive change on this anytime soon. While in principle I'm not necessarily in favor of gendered names (though I must say that as someone who deals with a lot of names and faces, being able to at least make a pretty good guess at what a person's gender will be by looking at their name before I meet them is useful), I don't think I'd want to subject my child to having an opposite-gender name, particularly if it's a boy. There would just be too much trouble for the child throughout life, and I wouldn't be willing to sacrifice my child's potential well-being in order to enact this kind of social change. It would feel too much to me like the child was a pawn in my game.
(I would, however, make it clear to my child that he/she is free to change his/her name once he/she becomes an adult, if he/she wants to choose to engage in this social change.)
I worry about when I eventually have children, and after everything we discuss and learn about in our feminist circles and women's studies classes. And the final thought we come to is, that we want to be progressive and break the norms...
But we also don't want to make our kids social experiments. Oy.
I think we need to change the humiliation of being mistaken for the opposite sex first. Once it becomes less embarrassing for a kid to have the wrong gender assumed of him/her, naming a child whatever name we want will become more acceptable.
Exactly. Why is it such a big deal, and why is it so important that we be able to tell a person's gender from their name? I really don't get it.
We struggle with the issue of socializing our girls in a way that will make it hard for them to "fit in," but in the end I think that having confident, well-adjusted kids that have many options open to them is more important than their ability to look exactly like their peers at every moment. And I really can't bring myself to say to them, "no honey, you can't do/say/be that because you're a girl."
1 - I remember when I was in High School there was a male student named Ashley, which is originally a boy's name. We had a new principal (maybe his second year) who was presiding over the National Honor Society Awards. Ashley won the top award of something or other, and the principal was going over his general "resume" lauding him in front of the gathered students and parents... except he kept saying "she". We all felt so embarrassed that our principal didn't even bother to find out that this great student was not "she".
2 - On another note, I have two friends, one male, one female who have the same originally male but now almost exclusively female name (he's the first dude I ever met with it). To keep them straight in conversation, we added suffixes to their names -tonio for the male and -ette for the female. This is simply because we got tired of saying "I went out with X last night" and then having to amend it with a last name or a gender.
We had a similar thing happen at a school function with a male student named Kristen. It was the middle school awards something or other, and for some reason they did separate awards for boys and girls. We had to stand up whenever our name was called for an award so the parents and everyone could clap for us, and for every single award, Kristen was called with the other girls, for the girls' A Honor Roll or girls' Good Citizen Award or whathaveyou. He sat through the whole thing, completely humiliated.
I don't think people will ever get over gendered names. I work at a baby superstore, and I see it everyday, not so much with names, but with how people color-code their babies. Once, I had a male customer buying gifts from a registry for a friend's girlfriend, and he actually called his friend to verify that it was the right registry because he didn't understand why there were so many "boy" items, when he knew they were having a girl. When I rang up his items, I saw that she had registered for a lot of yellows, greens, light blues and soft browns, cute striped and polka dot patterns, frogs, bumblebees... when I get customers like this (which I do every day), I want to ask them what is so inherently male (or female) about certain colors that makes them unacceptable for the other sex, but I have a feeling my bosses wouldn't like that.
Great post, always thought about that conundrum. And the idea of pink/blue for female/male stems back from when we're born [in a hospital] and we're dressed in pink or blue booties, hat and blanket to denote female or male, respectively.
As for me, I was named after Ashley Wilkes from Gone with the Wind, and while I'm female and Ashley is a stereotypically "female" name, it's interesting that, nonetheless, I was named after a male. I love it. =)
This topic has my name all over it. (Uh, no pun intended) I remember attending a dinner where my mom was among the guests of honor for her contributions to her workplace (and the community - she's a social worker). Anyway, her boss was reading from cue cards and talked a bit about how awesome she was to be raising "her three boys, Darren, Joshua, and Michal" by herself. He blushed quite a bit when he met me later on.
Heh, I do encounter people often trying to "feminize" or soften my name by giving me nicknames like Mimi, Mikey, or Mish. (I find it funny how how presumptuous some people can be to take those kinds of liberties) But I just call myself Mike, and so do most people - and if they don't, I correct them.
Actually, this is one of my pet peeves. It's always the girl who gets the boy name. Rarely will you see a boy named, say, Sophia or Mary or Elizabeth. What's going on is devaluing the female names. They're seen as less desirable. Sounds pretty sexist to me.
So if someone's claiming to be gender-neutral by naming their daughter, say, James, they had better be just as OK with naming their son Hannah.
In this thread we had mention of boys named Erin, Kristen and Ashley. Also, my brother had a (male) friend named Loren when he was a kid. So it does happen both ways. Though I guess not as often.
Actually Loren (and Lauren) was originally more popular as a boy's name. Lauren first became more popular for girls in the 1940s, and Loren didn't become popular for girls until the 1980s.
So many names that we think of as "girl's names" are actually just gender neutral names that are currently out of favour for boys (in North America at least). For example: Andrea, Lindsey, Joan, Kelly, Leslie, Alice, Val, Ivy, Stacey, Ariel, Ann, Carol, Ashley, Avery, Beverly, Loren, Susan, Courtney, Hilary, Gail, Laverne, Kimberly, Jane, Judy, Lonnie, Mandy, Marion, Whitney... all perfectly acceptable names for boys in the last century, and the list goes on.
Names go out of fashion, but they come back in fashion too, and I think we over-estimate the social damage done by having an unusual name. I grew up with a male Kimberly, Stacy, Carol, and Leslie - none of them seem the worse the wear for it. We just need to stop worrying about somehow damaging boys by giving them "girly" names, because really the gender neutral or "manly" name you gave them when they were born could be considered a girl's name by the time they're 20 anyway (my great uncle Beverly can vouch for that).
For real. In my experience it's the parents' discomfort that's really the issue. People are sooo worried that someone might mistake their baby for the wrong gender, and if they make a mistake about your baby they're so apologetic and mortified (as my mom would say). I can't really understand it.
Our baby is a year old, still has short but thick hair, is named Quinn, and is usually dressed in a gender-neutral way. But she's very striking with her big blue eyes and red cheeks, so lots of people stop to comment on how cute she is. About half the time they assume she's a boy. We often don't correct them on it, but when we do we don't really act offended, and kind of think it's funny. After they get over being embarrassed and apologizing they often look at us all weird, like it's our fault they were embarrassed since we didn't stick a huge bow to her head or dress her all in pepto-bismol pink like other parents.
I really don't get the overriding need to identify the gender of every individual. Maybe Judith Butler is right, and heteronormativity is behind it. It's the only explanation that makes much sense.
Two fun resources for checking out the popularity of names between the genders:
* The Baby Name Wizard NameVoyager
* The U.S. Social Security Administration Baby Names page
Who knew that in the 1890s Mary and Carole were as popular as Andy as a boy's name? In fact, Mary didn't fall off the top 1000 names for boys in the United States until the 1970s.
Feminist discussion aside, Wren, Corey and Wesley are going to have hard times due to their stupid names. Parents shouldn't give their kids odd names if they cared about what their child would have to go through for them.
I'm not sure why I'm surprised to see such an assholish comment from you. If you're not interested in constructive dialogue, then I suggest you find another blog. And while you're at it, choose a more appropriate username.
I have an "odd" name, and I LOVE it! Actually, most people I know with "odd" names do.
Also worth mentioning is the fact that pink used to be the "masculine" color (because it deviates from red, which is considered the "manliest" of colors), and light blue used to be the "feminine" color (because it was considered a more demure and delicate color). It wasn't until the 1940s that the two colors somehow became inverted.
It's amazing to me how ingrained the association between pink and "girly" has become in our society in such a short amount of time. Most of us see pink and immediately think of little girls and princesses.
My given name is Michelle, but I was named after a male hockey player, Michel. My parents decided to feminize it to make life easier for me, apparently forgetting that the Beatles' song "Michelle" predated my birth by only a year or so.
In high school, because there were so many Michelle's a friend of mine started calling me Mickey because she got tired of yelling "Michelle" and having four to eight people turn around.
You would not believe how many times I get, "Mickey? Don't you mean Nikki? Mickey is a boy's name." Particularly the way I spell it. I had a room-mate who used to "cute" it up, "Miquee," to make it more girly. Sigh.
Yeah I have a similar problem. My name is Charly. It is not short for anything. Just Charly (This is how I've been introducing myself for the past 10 years...so that the question "Is that short for Charlotte? Charlene?" can't even exit someone's mouth). Granted, the spelling sometimes clues people in that I may be a girl, but more often than not people are surprised when I walk through the door. After their initial shock, people tend to like my name...even giving me the nickname "Charles".
I've always liked my name. I will say that it gets a little awkward when someone calls out "Charlie!" and a little boy and I turn around at the same time...or when I dated a guy also named "Charlie" (Just Charlie...not Charles...). But it fits me and I wouldn't change it for anything.
Oh HALLELUJIHA!!(or however it's spelled)
This doesn't have to do with names, but gender "norms" and such...
When I was pregnant with my second son, I gave my first born son a baby doll. I got all sorts of crap from people etc...why? Because BOYS don't get baby dolls!!!
Why did I give him a baby doll? Because I wanted him to learn how to hold a baby and how to be gentle.
When I gave my second son a baby doll when I became pregnant with my third son, my father inlaw flipped out!!
But when my husband explained WHY I gave him a baby doll, he saw the logic and the reasoning.
Although my husband is a feminist, he still wants his sons to adhere to gender specific roles. He doesn't want his sons to wear angel costumes or other "girl leaning" costumes at Christmas.
This bugs me because quite a few times, I want to dress my youngest son (who's still a baby) in an angel costume or dress him as a bunny....
We settled on a pumpkin.
Anyway,sorry for the rant!!
Unfortunately it's not necessarily just the name that links to gender. From experience I've found that sometimes looks are even more powerful than the name. Let me elaborate. My name is Elizabeth and I look and act like a guy much of the time, or so I'm told, which is who I am so I don't really give a damn. This gets really interesting when I present my visa or introduce myself. There are pretty much two responses I generally get. The first don't notice/don't care and nothing out of the norm happens. The second group questions my identity saying "you're name's not Elizabeth" or "this isn't you." After being assured that my name is indeed Elizabeth, this group further splits into two groups. The one group apologizes profously stating they mistook me for a guy, while the other group takes pity on me stating "I thought Elizabeth was a girl's name." This group seems to think I'm some unfortunate guy who was given a girl's name by my parents. Interesting reaction, no?
Because of the trouble sometimes associated with my name, I've considered maybe changing it to something a little more androgynous, though I'm not sure if it's worth it. The names I've considered include Jayden (Jay for short), Sloan/Sloane, Trace, Chase, Mikey, Harper, Hunter, and Mitch.
All said and done, I think society should do away with both gender and race. This would create the equality so many are looking for. Where gender would still be key though would be for sex specific health. Other than that, in my opinion of course, people should be equal in every regard. Just my two cents worth.
Unfortunately it's not necessarily just the name that links to gender. From experience I've found that sometimes looks are even more powerful than the name. Let me elaborate. My name is Elizabeth and I look and act like a guy much of the time, or so I'm told, which is who I am so I don't really give a damn. This gets really interesting when I present my visa or introduce myself. There are pretty much two responses I generally get. The first don't notice/don't care and nothing out of the norm happens. The second group questions my identity saying "you're name's not Elizabeth" or "this isn't you." After being assured that my name is indeed Elizabeth, this group further splits into two groups. The one group apologizes profously stating they mistook me for a guy, while the other group takes pity on me stating "I thought Elizabeth was a girl's name." This group seems to think I'm some unfortunate guy who was given a girl's name by my parents. Interesting reaction, no?
Because of the trouble sometimes associated with my name, I've considered maybe changing it to something a little more androgynous, though I'm not sure if it's worth it. The names I've considered include Jayden (Jay for short), Sloan/Sloane, Trace, Chase, Mikey, Harper, Hunter, and Mitch.
All said and done, I think society should do away with both gender and race. This would create the equality so many are looking for. Where gender would still be key though would be for sex specific health. Other than that, in my opinion of course, people should be equal in every regard. Just my two cents worth.
Unfortunately it's not necessarily just the name that links to gender. From experience I've found that sometimes looks are even more powerful than the name. Let me elaborate. My name is Elizabeth and I look and act like a guy much of the time, or so I'm told, which is who I am so I don't really give a damn. This gets really interesting when I present my visa or introduce myself. There are pretty much two responses I generally get. The first don't notice/don't care and nothing out of the norm happens. The second group questions my identity saying "you're name's not Elizabeth" or "this isn't you." After being assured that my name is indeed Elizabeth, this group further splits into two groups. The one group apologizes profously stating they mistook me for a guy, while the other group takes pity on me stating "I thought Elizabeth was a girl's name." This group seems to think I'm some unfortunate guy who was given a girl's name by my parents. Interesting reaction, no?
Because of the trouble sometimes associated with my name, I've considered maybe changing it to something a little more androgynous, though I'm not sure if it's worth it. The names I've considered include Jayden (Jay for short), Sloan/Sloane, Trace, Chase, Mikey, Harper, Hunter, and Mitch.
All said and done, I think society should do away with both gender and race. This would create the equality so many are looking for. Where gender would still be key though would be for sex specific health. Other than that, in my opinion of course, people should be equal in every regard. Just my two cents worth.
Also, bear in mind 'meanings' of names. I'm a writer and often if I'm writing fiction I'll look in a book of names or a name website where gives meanings. So many traditionally male names mean 'strong' or 'protector' whilst so many traditionally female names mean 'beautiful'. One example where this isn't the case is 'David' which means beloved.