By Tammy Sullivan
As a soldier in the National Guard, I believe that my job is to fight for freedom, including the freedom to stand up for what's right. That's why I decided to speak out about the mandatory pregnancy tests and discrimination against women soldiers at the New York National Guard.
I enjoy serving in the National Guard. I was originally a member of the Mississippi National Guard, and then I transferred to the New York National Guard. I am still enlisted in the Guard. I work as a broadcast journalist in my unit and in January 2008 I started working on a state active duty mission patrolling the airports. That's when I first learned about the Guard's practice of requiring women soldiers to take pregnancy tests.
After I had been on the state active duty task force full time for a few weeks, our superiors had all the women take a pregnancy test and told us we would have to take one every three months. In some ways, what was worse than the pregnancy test was having to sign a form — a "Statement of Understanding" — in which we had to agree that, if we got pregnant while we were on active duty, we would be released from duty — in other words, lose our jobs — and lose the medical benefits that families of soldiers are entitled to. Not only that, but our positions would not be guaranteed if we wanted to come back after the pregnancy.
Many of the soldiers, women and men, thought that the testing and the form were unfair. Men weren't required to sign a "Statement of Understanding" like the one we were told to sign, and when men on the force had babies, they did not lose their jobs and their families continued to receive health benefits. Men who were injured were allowed to stay on the task force doing "light duty" jobs.
I refused to sign the form, so I lost my job on the task force. I felt that the pregnancy testing was an invasion of privacy. Some of the other soldiers felt they had to sign the form because they couldn't afford to lose their jobs. A few of us tried to complain about the practice, but we were told we had to pick our battles. I went through the proper military channels: chain of command, IG [Inspector General], and JAG [Judge Advocate General] but was discouraged with the lack of support and general blasé attitude the military leadership took toward what I saw as a serious issue. That's when I decided to call the ACLU.
I'm glad that speaking up helped convince the Guard to change its policy and get rid of the mandatory pregnancy testing and the pregnancy form. Under the new policy, all soldiers sign the same form . The new policy will still have an unfair effect on pregnant women, almost all of whom will have to leave the force eventually, at least to give birth. It would be more fair if all soldiers who have children could keep their jobs and their families' health benefits throughout the pregnancy and birth, but at least now the Guard will not be testing women or making women sign forms that don't apply to the other soldiers.
To listen to a podcast of Tammy discussing the case with ACLU Women's Rights Project Staff Attorney Ariela Migdal, click here .
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Challenging the New York National Guard's Discriminatory Pregnancy Testing Policy.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/12332
Hey, good for you. So tell me, what would be the consequences now for someone who broke their leg vs someone who became pregnant?
Yes the new ruling is a bit confusing. But this was a brave stand to take! It sounds like though pregnant women still get screwed over when push comes to shove...
Ok, this comment is probably going to catch some heat:
If you have placed yourself in a career where you readiness for duty is paramount, where the safety and security of our nation is dependent upon you, you should not be jeopardizing your fitness for service. So I have two friends in the marines, both of whom's tours in Iraq ended early. One lost the better part of a limb (IED) and the other was pregnant. Losing a limb, becoming a casualty - an individual does not control these things and is part and parcel with being a soldier. The girl who got pregnant (by consensual sex, not the epidemic military rape, it is important to note) I have no sympathy for when her unit turned its back on her. Her sole goal is to be ready to serve and she betrayed that trust.
I fully support women in the military - they risk enormous sacrifice. However, its not like every other job - you're not a lawyer or librarian or chef or teacher, your physical condition does affect your job.
Yes, women have the right to have babies. But they also do not have the right to impede the readiness of our armed forces. And while pregnancy tests for female forces may seem sexist, only women can be pregnant. I'm against, in civilian society, pregnancy being treated as a disease, but in the military it is simply something that renders you unfit for combat/combat support, like any injury or illness, and so its hard for me to fault them for testing for something that would cause them to lose troops. If there was some condition that only men could get that that rendered them unfit for combat, damn straight they should be tested for it.
In summation: you have made a commitment to your unit and your country. Don't get pregnant. If you want a job where you are free to procreate, choose a desk job and stop giving the assholes that want women out of the armed services fuel for their fire.
Let me walk your commissioner through this: A bad Anchorman joke is a popular culture reference. A sneezing baby panda is a popular culture reference. McLovin is a popular culture reference. Anything that involved a celebrity and the police might be part of the popular consciousness, but that doesn't make it funny or appropriate. Do they get stuff like "We Jump as High as Robert Downey Jr. was in the 90s?" Did they get bedroom furniture any "popular culture references" that related to white people's suffering? (e.g. Heath Ledger)
the military it is simply something that renders you unfit for combat/combat support, like any injury or illness, and so its hard for me to fault them for testing for something that would cause them to lose troops. If there was some condition that only men could get that that rendered them unfit for combat, damn straight they should be tested for it.
GED at Home | Homeschool Online | Online Diploma
great article. it really was insightful male enhancement pills