I did another one of those link hopping things today. Followed a post from one place to another and finally ended up on the Atlantic Monthly's page.
There is an article from the upcoming issue about breastfeeding.
It's titled: The Case Against Breastfeeding
It made me want to throw a few things at my computer.
I decided that my computer was not to blame, and neither is the woman who wrote the article.
She actually makes several good points.
Women often face enormous amount of social pressure to do the right thing for their children, even when the 'right' thing can really be one of many things.
Women are often blamed for doing too little (Uh oh. Cold mother? Your child's autism is a reaction), too much (Clingy mother? You've made your son gay!) or things that are just plain bad (A glass of wine? Shame on you! Your child's delay is your fault!).
While I'm not advocating for being a non-responsive/overly-aggressive/drinker during pregnancy and childrearing, there's a pretty good body of evidence that women cannot and should not be blamed for the complexity that is human growth and development.
Anyway, back to my rant about the breastfeeding article.
The author, Hanna Rosin, spends most of the first page talking about the difficulties of being shackled to her baby during its breastfeeding months.
She points out that women are ostracized if they choose to bottle feed, and that scare tactics are used to keep women breastfeeding lest they create undernourished, stupid acne ridden children.
She's right about the weak evidence that links IQ or acne to breastfeeding practices.
She's right about how her baby would likely grow up to be equally intelligent, happy etc whether she bottle feeds him or not.
But she's forgetting that she's obviously living in a rather lovely bubble, vacuum cleaners and all forms of male oppression included.
She has high SES, which is the great equalizer for many other things.
Lead poisoning in your child? High SES will help ensure that their IQ remains along a normal path (not so if you're low SES).
Bottle fed or breastfed? Probably doesn't matter if you have enough money for good food, schools and ongoing parental involvement.
But she totally erases the expediences of many women, both in the US and around the world who cannot rely upon their wealth and status as the great equalizer for their children.
Maybe breastfeeding does not give your baby extra IQ points (and maybe it does! weak evidence does not mean no impact..just need more info!).
But in countries where the infant mortality rate is 7x (or even higher) that of the United States, early and exclusive breastfeeding has been found to be one of the most effective ways to save lives.
So while it's something worthy of a healthy debate among the playgroup tight jean set that Ms. Rosin so cleverly mocks, it's literally a matter of life and death for infants around the world and even in Ms. Rosin's own city.
So while I don't disagree with her characterization of breastfeeding as a personal decision (one for which women should not be shamed or ostracized no matter the outcome), it's rather upsetting that she repeatedly compares this important and life saving measure to vacuum cleaning.
I'd love to go toe to toe with her mountain of research.
I'm pretty sure my 'saves lives' research is more compelling in the argument for breastfeeding than the evidence against because it may or may not help prevent acne.


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: When science goes wrong..or why I find this women's take on breastfeeding so irritating.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/12804















I doubt she is going to get very far with her "mountain" of research, which is relatively a goosebump compared to what the mainstream medical community has in support of breast milk.
OK this is off topic, but I was breastfed and I had the worst acne ever.
I think she's talking about breastfeeding in OUR society, and she's right. She did mention other studies about women rationing formula and using dirty water, etc.
Breastfeeding makes very little difference in a middle class, working woman's world, which is the point here.
I loved the article.
"High SES"???
Uh, those of us who speak English as a first language would use the word "rich".
Or "affluent"
Or "upscale"
Or "upper class".
But "high SES"?
That sounds like a food additive!
Try Plain English, instead of Academic Jargonese, please!
And actually, the author DID make the point about how class status, rather than breast milk, is responsible for most of the variables that were supposedly caused by breast feeding.
Because, as we know, being able to take a whole year off from work is a CLASS PRIVILEGE available only to mothers who are married to men with really good jobs.
Those "High SES" folks you refer to (the ones English speakers would say are "rich people" - Spanish speakers might call them "los ricos")
I like the Academic jargon. Don't dumb down your work.
I'm sure this makes me a Patriarchist, but aren't pregnant women supposed to avoid alcohol for legitimate reasons?
aleks I would think thats a legitimate remark. Alcohol can be bad in any quantity on the child, as each person is different. Especially since its the only 100 % preventable syndrome.
However, I think that if there is a male, or female partner to the one that is pregnant, should also obstain from alcohol.
I thought it was a good article.
I've often thought it was reprehensible the way that new mothers are "shamed" into breastfeeding their babies.
And she talks about doing lots of research to find out if breastfeeding was all it was touted to be and finding out that there are only slight differences to be found in breastfed vs non-breastfed children.
I've wondered for years if all the supposed benefits of breastfeeding weren't manufactured evidence to keep women tethered to their babies instead of out in the world holding down gainful employment (and this is not a slam against SAHMs. I just don't think women should be guilted into doing something they don't want to do.)
Mothers, there is evidence that breast feeding is beneficial to your children. We as a society encourage you to take all actions that are both reasonable on your part, and beneficial to your children, but it is ultimately your decision.
Done.
Amen. Now if only we could get the hysteria crazed media to concede…
I think you were too harsh on this article. I think Rosin is commenting on middle and upper class society in the United States and the incredible pressure society places on new mother's to breastfeed. I have a friend who is experiencing financial hardship (she can’t afford all specialized lactate nurses and the like), but wants to do the best for her now eight month old son. She was unable to breastfeed; her son didn't take to it and it was incredibly painful for her. She was devastated for months because she felt like a bad mother for not breastfeeding her child.
This kind of media manipulation is what continues to reinforce oppression of women, in these subtle and seemingly innocent ways, making good women and good mothers feel guilty for their “inadequacies”. It can lead a woman who considers herself to be a feminist to create judgments and put pressure on other women. This “medical community” that has proclaimed that “breast is best” is made up largely of men, again telling women what is best for their bodies, telling women that they must sacrifice themselves for the good of the children.
I also think Rosin’s point about breastfeed leading to the mother being the primary caretaker of the children because of the father’s inability to breastfeed is really poignant. Strict breastfeeding means that mom cannot leave baby with dad for extended periods of time. Another friend of mine introduced formula when her son was about a month old because she felt like a food factory. She had completely lost any sense of identity or purpose outside of feeding her child. She now balances the breast milk with formula and is much happier for it. It is completely inappropriate for society to cast judgment on her decision. She did what was best for herself, her husband and their child.
As a feminist if it is really important for you to lead by example and have a domestically balanced relationship with your husband, breastfeeding is a factor—and I love how Rosin points out that breastfeeding is not free, unless you do not value the time of the woman. Again, we are talking about upper/middle class women who reside in the United States—which is a large portion of our population/society.
in one word: colostrom. after that, the benefits are more psychological than immunological or nutritional - which is not to denegrate that at all. breastfeeding becomes less of a health imperative as a newborn ages. even so, some nutrition is better than none (human, bovine, goat, or soy based). bottle feeding is largely an adaptive response to modern pressures. older strategies still exist for mothers unable to lactate. check your local laleche league, if you haven't already.
i find it odd that no mention was made of the pain incurred through sustained breast feeding. of course, there are modern solutions for that as well (breast pumps, refrigeration)
also noticed a comment that claimed UPPER, MIDDLE class, u.s. women are still a large population segment. i really wonder at the source and date of that demographic error.