So same sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Iowa. (And will be in Vermont and Maine by September 2009). We're really happy for those states, but also pissed off that our own state of New York hasn't followed suit yet. That may be about to change, but we have some work to do first.
In April Governor David Patterson introduced a bill to legalize same-sex marriage (one that a majority of New York voters support ). The bill would amend the Domestic Relations Law to give same-sex couples the opportunity to enter into civil marriages, qualifying them for state rights on issues such as property ownership, inheritance, healthcare and insurance coverage. (Note: it specifically says "civil marriages", so all those bullshit lies about how priests could go to jail for not performing same sex weddings don't apply).
The bill has just passed through the New York State Assembly by a bipartisan vote of 89-52 . Yay! Getting it through the Senate might be a little trickier. (A similar bill passed in the Assembly in 2007 with a vote of 85-61, but couldn't pass in the Senate).
Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith has stated that he won't bring the bill to the floor of the Senate unless he' s sure it has sufficient votes to pass. As of now it still seems like the numbers come up short, so what can we do about that? Although Republican Senate Minority Leader Dean Skelos opposes marriage equality, in April he stated that members of the Senate Republican Conference will be free to vote their consciences rather than pressuring the GOP to vote against the bill.
Recent articles in New York magazine and the New York Times broke it down on who the swing voters might be. Some of them are "undecided" on the issue (or just haven't spoken out publicly about their stance) while others are against the bill but worth the time to try to convince them to change their minds! So we think it'd be a good idea to get in touch with those Senators and tell them how important it is for them to support same-sex marriage.
- Thomas P. Morahan (R-Rockland County) - He has said that he's "not going to come out one way or the other" on the issue.
- Kemp Hannon (R-Nassau County) - He told the Times that although he's inclined to oppose the bill, it "deserves serious consideration".
- Vincent L. Leibell (R-Westchester/Putnam/Dutchess) - He prefers civil unions to marriage, but said that he might not make up his mind until the last minute and that "society changes over time". (Interesting piece of info: His law practice does estate planning for gay couples).
- James S. Alesi (R-Rochester) - "My public opinion has not been stated yet, and it probably won't be for a while". (Possible factor: He attends a church that blesses same-sex unions).
- Kenneth P. LaValle (R-Hamptons) - Gay rights advocates consider him "open" to considering a yes vote.
- Elizabeth O'C. Little (R-Queensbury) - Gay rights supporters believe she is "within reach". So um, let's reach out to her, shall we?
- William T. Stachowski (D-Buffalo) - He opposes expanded same-sex marriage rights.
- David J. Valesky (D-Oneida) - He was quoted in April : "I don't think that that's an issue that should be at the forefront of the Senate agenda and I would be very surprised if it was anytime soon." He would not say whether he himself supported the bill or not.
- Shirley L. Huntley (D-Jamaica) - She opposes the bill largely based on her religious beliefs and that she's had a "large influx of calls and letters from constituents who asked me not to support it." Hm... sounds like it's time for a large influx of calls and letters from constituents who do want her to support it?
- Brian X. Foley (D-Suffolk County) - He has yet to voice a decision either way.
- Ruth Hassell-Thompson (D-Bronx/Westchester) - She's said that she's reserving judgment on the issue. Good sign:"I always try to believe that I'm an open-minded person." Bad sign: "This is an issue that challenges the fundamental believes that people have and that's not easy."
- John L. Sampson (D-Brooklyn) - He went from no to undecided, saying "I can't impose my own religious beliefs in a situation like this".
- Joseph Addabbo Jr. (D-Howard Beach) - He said in April that he's yet to make a decision, but that "gay marriage is not a priority at this time ".
- George Onorato (D-Astoria) - He might be the biggest problem of all the Democrats... Apparently he has pledged to vote against marriage equality for reasons of "faith" and being "old fashioned and so far little progress has been made with him. There are already have been organized attempts to change his mind , so feel free to jump on board, especially if you're from his district.
You can contact the New York Senate: here or here .
Maybe you think it's a waste of time... but look at U.S. Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), who no longer supports the Defense of Marriage Act, despite voting for it in the past. And here in New York, Assembly member Joe Lentol initially opposed gay marriage, but voted for the bill in 2007, and there are several members who voted no in 2007 but changed their votes to yes this time around. The point is that politicians do change their minds - and it's up to us to help them get there in time for this bill to pass.
For more information on which district you live in and what you can do in your area: Marriage Equality New York . (If you're in NYC this weekend, you might also want to check out this event May 17th).
And of course, if you are going to try to go head to head with your senator, some myth-busting tips from Empire State Pride Agenda might help you counter any anti-gay arguments.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Marriage Equality Bill Passes NYS Assembly, Now On To The Senate!.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/13680
Great rundown! The major question in my mind is Malcolm Smith. He said he would not bring it to the floor without the votes, but I don't know if that's on the level. Ruben Diaz Sr. and his minions have threatened to defect from D to R over this issue and take the Senate back to the other party. Realistically, they probably could do that. Smith had to cut a deal for Majority Leader, and the deal is widely understood to have involved backburnering marriage equality. So, is Smith going to hold for 32 votes, which would require at least three Rs? Or is his real deal that it will not come to the floor no matter what, and whip count is his cover? Not that Smith personally has an issue with marriage equality -- he has publicly supported it over the objections of his politically active pastor. But that may be what he thinks he has to do to keep his coalition together.
I'm very worried.
Since I"m not from New York State I doubt my input would sway votes but I think one thing to focus on is how first and foremost these guys are politicians and are sensitive to the way the win is blowing. No one wants to be on the wrong side of history. Focus on the progress of Gay rights and Gay marriage and remind them that if New York passes on this and all surrounding states support it that it will show that New York is farther behind all of those states and will look bad for them.
Thanks for posting, I live in Queens, and Onorato is my State Senator. There has been quite a bit of activity in the district, and I've just gotten involved with Marriage Equality NY, and Western Queens for Marriage Equality (an umbrella of a number of supportive orgs).
I'm hosting a meeting to to gear up for a meeting with Onorato and an upcoming rally, if you're interested, you can RSVP here:
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/event.php?eid=96125290158
Fingers crossed for New York.
The 6 by 11 campaign* is quickly becoming a 7 by all campaign! It's exciting times in the Northeast with Rhode Island recently introducing legislation/action to pass same-sex marriage.
*6 by 11 is the goal of the Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) to have all 6 New England states be equal in marriage by 2011. They're doing phenominally well so far.
But can Rhode Island do it over Carcieri's certain veto? Vermont overrode a veto, the only state to do so, and in NH we're still waiting to see if Lynch will veto; but Carcieri absolutely will, which means RI either needs a supermajority or a new governor.
NY can probably do it right now, if Smith will put it on the floor.
My near-term goal is Delaware River to the North Pole. With NY and NH, that would leave only NJ and RI.
GO NEW YORK!! you can do it!!
I would like to send some e-mails, but I'm not a resident of New York. Should I do it anyway?
This news made my day that another state did this...now I just my state, Wisconsin would follow......
*wish*--> I just *wish* my state...lol
As a Hispanic from The Bronx
a Democratic Candidate
for the NYS Assembly for
District 83 and a father of
an eleven year old daughter;
I find it odd that the NYS
Assembly Members can overnight
a yes vote for same sex marriage
yet take an eternity to support
an equal parenting/joint custody
bill for NYS. I do support
Civil Unions with total equality
for all. I prefer the word
marriage be left to those who
seek a religious ceremony.
But here in NYS it is a tragedy
that children are deprived
from one or both parents due
to the present legal system.
Kids deserve to be with BOTH
parents and this is why I am
running. As a victim of the
NYS Family Court System, I
have suffered because I refuse
to give up on my daughter.
I will always be there for her
and support her in her decisions
Therefore, the time has come
that BOTH Men and Women rally
to support this cause as well.
Our organization, The Political
Parent Party, welcomes your
input and support. Feel free
to contact us at
politicalparentparty@yahoo.com
Thank you; Mark Rodriguez
The major feminist criticisms about this film that I see revolve around the writer and the producers overall .anti-feminist message; thereby reducing feminine power and reinforcing gender norms and stereotypes. This message is displayed throughout the film in the way that the characters of Steve Trevor and Persephone are developed. Each character, in their own way, does much to reduce the feminist ideology of the Amazons, through their actions and dialogue with other characters. Doctorate degree AND Online schools
If you haven't seen the film, in it Steve Trevor is constructed as a hyper-masculine chauvinist. He, like many of the social and cultural messages that (both men and women are taught) believes that women's only value is in their bodies. This stereotypical message is apparent from his introduction. When Steve Trevor first lands on Themyscira the producers [of the film] reinforce this cultural stereotype by reducing the strong Amazonian women into the constructed male fantasy of feminine or "lipstick" lesbians; they're beautiful, they're giggling, they're splashing each other and they're naked (ugh!). online Bachelor degree AND online foundation degree AND Online degree programs