By Rinku Sen
Over the past two weeks, Americans struggled to make sense of tragic shootings that seemed disconnected at first glance. Anti-Semite James Von Brunn killed Stephen T. Johns, a black security guard at the Holocaust Museum . George Tiller’s murder a few days earlier seemed to be about abortion, yet his shooter, Scott Roeder, also had roots in the racial purity movement. Yesterday, it was reported that the murders of Raul Flores and his daughter in Arizona were charged to three people with white supremacist ambitions.
There’s been lots of discussion about why hate crimes are rising and how to prevent future tragedies, yet we’ve largely missed the relationship between extremist racism and the less obvious version that plays out in our political debates. These shooters all felt that people of color (along with women and Jews) have stolen the birthright of white men. In his book “Kill the Best Gentiles,” Von Brunn rails against “the calculated destruction of the White Race.” Roeder was a member of the Montana Freemen; commenters on white supremacist websites praised him for ensuring that Tiller would never “kill another White baby.” Flores’ alleged murderers appear to have been preparing for a white uprising.
Our discussion of these events has boiled down to the idea that racism is an intentional, violent act of a lone crazy white man. Underlying this idea, however, is the unspoken assumption that since we criminalized such hatred through civil rights laws, there’s nothing else we can do as a country. Collectively, we bemoan the backwardness of “some” people before we move on, thinking of racism as isolated extremism.
But social psychologists who developed the Implicit Associations Test at Harvard and the Universities of Virginia and Washington in 1998 tell us that notions of the innate goodness of white people and the equally innate badness of people of color are so deeply imbedded in our minds that we’re totally unaware of making such judgments. Even I, a woman of color and racial justice activist for 25 years, have taken their online test with dismaying results. White supremacists speak their beliefs aloud, but we all have similar ideas and act on them in tiny ways that add up.
The notion that people of color get more than our share plays out again and again in our institutions and policies, expanding the racial divide. If we think that Black people manufactured the foreclosure crisis in order to get a handout, the law limits their ability to get relief. If we think that undocumented immigrants are leeching off the U.S., we will not pass an immigration reform that changes their status. If we think that children of color can’t learn, we don’t do what’s needed to improve public schools.
As a nation, we are about to make critical decisions about all our systems. Unconscious biases already permeate these debates every time we ask who deserves how much of health care, education, jobs. Our discourse is heavily coded. There’s no need to say that “illegal” equals Mexican, or that the “irresponsible” homeowner is black, or that “unqualified” means woman of color. Even if we don’t rhetorically attach these ideas to particular groups of people, our brains have been conditioned to make the connections anyway.
There’s particular danger in characterizing racism as isolated madness during the greatest recession in 60 years. We now have to rebuild our economy – will we continue with a model that includes stark inequality? That seems likely if we can’t grapple honestly with the racial gap, since structural inequality will always make our economy more vulnerable to a crash. That inequality is also what keeps us apart, in separate neighborhoods, schools and workplaces. That distance makes it much easier for violent extremists to recruit struggling white people into their ranks.
As white communities, particularly men, face conditions that have been chronic in communities of color, their vulnerability to racist ideas could disrupt the possibility of working together for real solutions. The unemployment of white men has more than doubled over the past year, from 4.2 to 8.5 percent. They are shocked, angry, and ready to direct all that heat somewhere. The most productive place for that energy is in alliance with communities of color, so that together, we can focus on changing the policies that allowed elites to run off with all our assets.
It is possible to craft truly universal social and economic policy that can both generate racial equity and improve life for everyone, including unemployed white men. There were racially-fueled murders before last week, and there’s every reason to think there will be more. As we grieve, the Obama Administration and Congress continue the immense task of rebuilding the economy and reforming immigration and healthcare. Something positive can emerge from these tragic events if our efforts to understand them led to policies that actually brought us together – in our lives, as well as in our minds.
Rinku Sen is the Executive Director of the Applied Research Center and the author of The Accidental American.


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The White Supremacist in Us.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/14452















I understand that this is perhaps not the right community to share this with, but, I find today's modern wave of feminism very offensive to me. I find a lot of the sentiments on this site very hurtful, and sometimes it seems like some of the women here want me to be ashamed just because I am a man.
Sometimes I feel very unfairly treated. I am a young white male, and there are no special interest groups for me. In fact, if I want to stand up and be proud of my white Dutch heritage, I can't, because the term "White power" is seen as a racist term, where as the term "Black power" or "Female power" is seen as a politically correct term.
Ladies, how am I supposed to take pride in what I am? How am I supposed to not feel shamed by this modern wave of feminism? I have never done anything to hurt anyone, and yet I am judged incorrectly as being "privileged" just because I am white, and male.
But I assure you, nothing is further from the truth. I have had to work hard, bust my a**, and earn everything I have now. No one has ever given me preferential treatment just because I am white, and a man. In fact, I have even been passed over for jobs BECAUSE I am a white man, because companies wanted to look more "diverse", so they would hire people of ethnic origins.
Sometimes I feel very disadvantaged because when I talk with feminists, some of them immediately take a negative tone with me just because of the color of my skin, and my sex.
What do you think I should do? Should I stand up for myself? How can I show the world that I am proud of what I am without being judged?
In fact, if I want to stand up and be proud of my white Dutch heritage, I can't, because the term "White power" is seen as a racist term
By all means you shouldn't let what other people say keep you from celebrating your heritage, but keep in mind that the term "White power" has already been co-opted by another group. But I do get the gist of what you're saying.
What do you think I should do? Should I stand up for myself? How can I show the world that I am proud of what I am without being judged?
Do what you feel is right for you. But yes, some people will always judge. If you disagree speak up.
I'm sorry you feel offended by feminist discourse. But if I told you that I am often offended by mainstream American culture, outright lies and erasure of our history, narrow colonialist beauty standards, scientists reporting that people from my background have low IQ, etc, what advice would you give me?
Maybe feminists take a negative tone with you because you say the sort of things you have said on other threads on this site, such as sarcastically stating that condoms are great because they make women act like big whores so men can fuck them without committing, or comparing reproductive rights to the KKK.
I knew his message didn't smell right to me.
I should have known too. Oh well.
As someone with many different varieties of privilege, you have to be one of the most patient when joining in a feminist discourse and recognize that your experiences cannot speak for everyone's.
While you may feel that you personally have never been favored because you are a white male, you don't know the thought process behind the person doing the favoring. And because you have had this experience, you can't assume it doesn't really happen to others.
I was passed over for a job just this week because I am a woman and before this, I had never felt discriminated against in the work force. I was told to my face that they would really rather hire a guy. Where was the job? A coffee shop.
Thanks for bringing up your points in a respectful way. Unfortunately, its rare to see from non-feminists on this site and that alone can help you in discussions.
"Thanks for bringing up your points in a respectful way. Unfortunately, its rare to see from non-feminists on this site and that alone can help you in discussions."
That's a bit of a premature judgement.
He's been trolling several posts, especially in the Community section, over the last couple of days.
I wouldn't say its premature--he did bring up his points respectfully on this post, after all. I'm down for whenever anyone wants to change the way they've been acting, even if it doesn't excuse their past behavior.
Trolling the last couple of posts, perhaps. But this isn't trolling, this is an honest, open question. Every man I have spoken to about these issues states these same concerns, and they have every right to. Just because we have it worse doesn't mean that what they suffer shouldn't be fixed as well. Although, I know you didn't say anything to counter that.
I'm on it. Sorry about that.
Astroboy, you *do* have an interest group if you feel like you are not privileged. It is the working class. I cannot get how and why young, white disadvantaged men complain about women and minorities rather than the capitalist system that is the real thing keeping them down. It's white men who make a fine living without working (living off of dividends and interest from "investments") who are the problem. They run a dishonest system where owning capital merits more than working and contributing to the greater good. You've long had brothers and sisters fighting for your cause, and they are socialists and marxists. However, these people are despised, harassed, and arrested for having better values than those of the non-working, leisure class. Let's put the blame where it is due rather than on people in the system who are even at a worse disadvantage than the white men of the working and poor class.
I'd like to point out that:
1) Plenty of non-white, non-male people invest.
2) Investing is a basic part of financial health -- working class people should do this too.
3) To actually make a livelihood on investments, you have to be constantly involved in it to the point where it's a day job.
4) Investing in anything that gives a substantial rate of return involves taking on risk.
5) Investing is what gives usable capital to many companies, which allows them to employ workers in the first place.
Tragic as thy are I have a hard time tying these two events together.
The writer talked about three events, but I'm going to assume that the two events you're referring to are the Tiller murder and the murder of the guard at the Holocaust museum. Tiller's murderer and John's murderer are both White supremacists.
Thanks, I didn't know that about the Tiller murderer, I thought he was just random crazy.
Astroboy, I suggest you check out this website for answers to many of your questions: http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/
Thanks for the link. But...are you referring to any specific section of that blog? I mean, it's pretty big, and after reading the main page, I'm not quite sure where my answers might be. Any suggestions?
Read it all.
Read the whole thing. It might take a whole half hour, but it's worth the time if you're truly committed to finding your answers.
This was a very good post. I've thought a lot about the way we think about social problems as "isolated incidents" lately, and how that originates from and is reinforced by some of the libertarian ideals that are commonly espoused by Americans - the primacy of the individual is the biggest example, but also the faith in capitalism.
I definitely get where you're coming from with Implicit Associations. In fact just the other day I was walking around town (I'm on vacation in Costa Rica) and my dad was looking for a place to get his money converted to the local currency. We came by what looked like a bank and we tried to open the door, but it was locked. Shortly after we tried it unlocked and a man in a suit opened the door and asked what we wanted. It did turn out to be a bank and we got our money changed, but I was struck by how alarmed I was at seeing this hispanic man in a suit. If it had been a white man in a suit I would have assumed he was the businessman that he was, but I saw him and I thought "crime" immediately. Why would I think that? I think it's very true that we internalize stereotypes to an alarming degree.
Thank you for posting this.
Hmm...you know, the page makes many assertions which I frequently do not see practiced by those whom claim to be feminist. For example
"A misogynist hates female autonomy. That is the core of the definition of misogynist."
Personally, I have been labeled as a misogynist simply for disagreeing with women, or even questioning feminism. Sometimes I just want to have a conversation about the issues, but I am rejected for discussion because my opinions oppose some certain feminist ideal. It makes discourse with some feminists very frustrating when I am not allowed to express my opinions about certain matters.
For example, I have been banned from pro-abortion websites just for stating why I am personally against abortion, even though I always do so in a respectful, non-antagonistic manner. Sometimes I feel like people don't even want to discuss an issue because they are afraid that my points might be valid.
The way I see it, I welcome any and all challenges to my opinions, because if I am never challenged, I will never grow.
Another thing which worries me is something I read in the FAQ of this site. It says that they don't censor people, but it also says that if your posts do not further the feminist agenda of this website, that they may be deleted, and you might be banned. I don't understand how that does not equal censorship of any dissenting opinion.
If feministing.com is in fact right with all their assertions, shouldn't they welcome any dissenting opinions? I mean, if they are right, then there should be no fear of opposition. Am I correct in this thinking?
I think you've probably been labeled a misogynist for the reasons TroubleBaby already stated, which I notice you didn't respond to.
There is no such position as "pro-abortion," and if you're going to make ignorant, propagandized remarks like that don't be surprised if no one bothers to engage in "discussion" with you. Read the Feminism 101 articles that Courtney linked for you. There's a reason that blog exists, and it's because people like you constantly show up here asking the same disingenuous questions, thinking they've never been asked before, and the majority of posters here are neither interested in nor responsible for educating you on the basics of feminism and privilege.
There's a difference between "dissenting opinions" and offensive, anti-feminist, anti-woman statements. This is a feminist space, and the editors aren't required to give anti-feminists a platform.
Personally, I have been labeled as a misogynist simply for disagreeing with women, or even questioning feminism.
If that's the case, the people you were debating with were unfortunately incapable of backing up their arguments, and so resorted to calling you names. That's not right.
For example, I have been banned from pro-abortion websites just for stating why I am personally against abortion, even though I always do so in a respectful, non-antagonistic manner
I don't know the details of the situation, so I can't say much about this. If that's all that happened, I don't think it's right, but maybe the people who banned you felt that you were only pushing your own views without doing any meaningful listening in return. But, again, I don't really know.
If feministing.com is in fact right with all their assertions, shouldn't they welcome any dissenting opinions?
I understand where you're coming from with this concern, but (from my limited experience here at Feministing), the comments that are deleted are generally ones that are inappropriately offensive or that have no reasoning. Basically, trolling is deleted. I don't mean comments that disagree with stuff posted -- I mean comments that, for example, place blame on rape victims or are just a copy and pasted succession of "BABY KILLER BABY KILLER BABY KILLER!" That sort of thing.
You seem intelligent and like someone I wouldn't at all mind conversing or debating with. However, keep in mind that some things you say may be taken in a very hurtful and offensive manner. For instance, I saw the comment you made about condom use making it possible for men to use women more easily. That was a hurtful and offensive comment for many reasons. I'll briefly list a few of them:
1) It makes it sound as though men take more joy in the physicality of sex than women.
2) It makes it sound as though sex is something that should be bought with dinner or a ring or any number of things, and it makes it sound as though marriage and life-sharing are done only for the purpose of sex.
3) It disregards the fact that people have loads of sex regardless of the availability of condoms. Condoms just make these activities safer.
Now, you really really don't seem, in this thread we're in right now, to want to offend anyone. So please keep in mind that there are real, intelligent, well-meaning people on the other end of the computer who you are essentially calling slutty used up whores when you make comments like the one I just broke down a little.
astroboy,
it seems you are earnest in your attempts to understand feminism and the discourse found on feminist blogs. I think going through the site Courtney linked is a good way to start, and if you open your mind a bit you will learn a whole lot.
More importantly- this post we are commenting under right now is about institutional racism and the lives of people of color in a racist white world. By overtaking this thread and making it about your experiences, you are erasing the voice of the author, a woman of color, and making it about you, a white man. Perhaps in an act of goodwill towards women and the people of color who read this blog, you could save this convo for a more appropriate thread. That would be really respectful and appreciated.
Thank you! You've written what I've tried to articulate many times in talking with people who have that bootstrap mentality: "I achieved everything I have all by myself, so why can't anyone else?" This attitude that people of color (of any class, but especially low-income) contribute less to society informs everything from reluctance to fund social investment programs to the racist violence we've seen lately.
And, to Astroboy: anyone who wishes to take part in a feminist community has an obligation to examine how they interact with privilege. As a white woman from the rural south, I am privileged in many ways, and under-privileged in a few. This can be a frustrating, humbling process, but it's valuable.
In our "Race, Gender, and the Media" class, we have discussed some the idea that America is now in a "post-racial society". I tend to disagree with that idea on most levels, but just looking at the incidents within the past few weeks that have a basis in white supremacy you have to reject the idea that our society is post-racial.
The issue of racism is deeply engrained in our psyche, from the media we grew up with and watch now to the interpersonal relationships and reactions we have both witnessed and observed. These “unconscious biases” as Sen refers to them can lead us into a “modern racism”. Modern racism is formed more along the subconscious and subtle prejudices and actions based on race, and less on the public racial biases that were more prevalent in the past (but are still quite visible in actions such as the recent shootings).
But to even say that the majority of racists in our society are “modern racists” would be incorrect even. Growing up in a more southern state in a mostly white semi-rural area, I still have relatives who tend to use racial slurs like there is nothing wrong with it.
@astroboy: Sometimes the concept of privilege is a little harder to grasp at first. It may not be that you’ve had preferential treatment in finding jobs, but there are more subtle ways in which we as white men in America have privilege. In one of my posts I refer to a chapter by Peggy McIntosh titled “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack”. (http://www.case.edu/president/aaction/UnpackingTheKnapsack.pdf) I would suggest reading that to help gain some perspective of what privilege can cover; try substituting other minorities for some of the examples if that helps to understand male privilege rather than white privilege.
Certain moments stick with you in the process of unlearning privilege. In my first quarter at Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, I had no idea nearly all the students in my dorm were white until a couple of black brothers came over from their dorm to talk to us about what i'd never heard of before, "institutional racism." I didn't get how i was a racist, since two of my four best friends in high school were black. It took an incident in a dime store to inform me. The man ahead of me was paying for a soda and handed the older white woman behind the counter his money. Rather than take it from his hand, she told him, "Put it on the counter." In that moment, I saw my white privilege, the privilege of not being insulted with impunity by somebody whose delusion makes them imagine they are too good to touch anybody with darker skin than theirs. Multiplying that moment by millions makes for a vast amount of privilege I never before had been aware was mine, even as I hung out with Donald and his older brother Ray for two years in high school. I had had no inkling of the kind of shit they had to put up with from fools not that much different (at least in skin color and level of imagination) than me.
To astro guy, read Tim Wise on whiteness. For that matter, read Toni Morrison on Blackness and American literature. If you care enough, you'll study, read a variety of sources, listen listen listen and then maybe find the answers you're seeking in quiet reflection, and next time ask questions with less of a tone of righteous hurt or victimhood and more of a tone of humble amazement that human beings have been being so vicious in so many ways that escaped your/our notice for so many of our early years on this planet.
But you may take the easy way out and join a "men's rights" group that loves to mock feminism and pretend to be the victim of women instead of trying to understand the complexity of society's various forms of disenfranchisement, and take responsibility for knowing and avoiding indulging in the diversity of divide-and-conquer tactics the colonialist ruling classes have used to maintain and expand their domination over the rest of us, regardless of our sex, sexual orientation, age, income, level of success in school or the military or jail or wherever, our ethnicity or size or "looks" or speed or talent or various rankings and statuses etc.
Hey, metrodirtman. I already love you! I just came back from a week in Yellow Springs, where my partner works at Antioch U. It is a special institution in a wonderful town which both should be a model to all of us Americans. People like you are the hope of the future. Peace to you!
metrodirtman
Thank god for people like you (and the OP for a brilliant post). Stay on feministing and do some educating. It's great when some non POC do the heavy lifting on 101 education on feministing for a change.
The really frightening thing about these tragedies is when I think back to a few months ago. When the Department of Homeland Security released a report stating that right-wing extremism posed the most dangerous threat of domestic terrorism to this country. After Obama was elected, white supremacist groups were totally stoked about it--because they knew it would be a powerful tool for recruiting and radicalizing new members. A black man is president, look what this country has come to, we have to reclaim America for the white race, etc. It's great propaganda fodder.
But when that report came out, people were flippin' a shit all over the place. Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, and co. were popping blood vessels in outrage. American terrorists??? And white ones at that??? Madness!! (Apparently, everyone has forgotten about Timothy McVeigh)
Fast forward a couple months and look where we've found ourselves.
If you asked an 8 year old to draw a picture of a terrorist, everyone knows what they would draw.
Say the word terrorist to a full-grown adult and chances are, the same image will materialize in their minds as well. When will Americans face that perhaps the most imminent threats to this country are right here among us.