Hey Everyone
Thanks for all your feedback, even that from those of you who feel I have offended you. Firstly I want to apologize for using this second post as a response to all your feedback, but I honestly didn’t imagine there would be so many comments so quickly. I will try to respond to what I feel you were all getting at in the comments.
I would also like to take a quick second to explain myself to the people who felt my post was inappropriate and ignorant. For me, when I am interested in learning about an issue or organization or anything for that matter, I like to get first hand stories and experiences from people who have an understanding of whatever it is I am trying to learn about. Rather then read a collection of academic journals and essays on a topic, I like to see how it affects people and more importantly, how people who believe in it understand and interpret it? I figured a blog is probably the most likely place to find a good collection of personal interpretations. So I typed feminist blog into google and feministing came up. I am sorry if you believe my way of trying to learn about something is wrong but I find I get the best understand of ideas in this manner. To make an absolutely horrible but effective analogy on my methods of learning; consider I want to know if a film is any good or not. Rather then check the critics response to it I like to check a bunch of everyday peoples reviews on a place like imdb.com, I find it both better relates to me and the people I know and gives a clearer picture of what I’m trying to understand.
I get that there are still plenty of people who still feel I’m going at this wrong… maybe I am, and I respect that you all know a hell of a lot more about feminism then I do so I will still take in what your saying and hopefully learn from my mistakes in this matter.
I will say, however that I feel you kinda jumped at me for a question I didn’t feel I was demanding you to answer. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough to all of you but I didn’t mean to say that there was harmful and non-harmful sexism I was trying to ask if people could relate direct experiences to academic examples of sexism in that when you read about modern sexism it speaks in generalizations and I was only hoping to get a picture of how the accumulated stories and examples of sexism in the masses relates to the amount and variety of sexism one experiences as an individual. I am sure, do to my ignorance or something else, I am only digging myself deeper for some of you and I’m not sure how I can help it until I learn what it is I’m doing wrong. I’m getting through the links a lot of you posted and I am learning a ton so thanks for those.
Thank you again to everyone who shared their experiences and helped me better understand sexisms current state… though I clearly still have a lot to learn. I look forward to continue browsing around feministing to see what else there is around.
Lastly just a request, not a demand, but there’s something to be said about just being nice to people, and some of those comments bordered on hurtful. Next time maybe step back from the issues being discussed and just treat anyone, male or female, ignorant or educated, kindly.


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Response to Comments on my Question about Sexism.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/15358














thanks for taking time to post this follow up. i'm hoping you found some insightful stuff?
I appreciate your response since it clears up your motivations a little bit.
I think one of the main reasons that some reacted harshly was a result of the statement you made about how you couldn't see any examples of harmful sexism in Western society. While I understand now that you are just trying to learn, you also have to realize that on feministing we get lots and lots of trolls claiming that there's no real sexism anymore and that we're all just complaining about nothing. So when you said that you can't see any day-to-day examples of harmful sexism, it sounded to me as if you were asking us all to defend the very existence of feminism. Feminism is such an important part of so many of our lives, that people may get offended when you come onto a feminist website and ask us to explain why feminism is still relevant.
I'm glad that you're excited to learn about feminism and I hope you got some useful comments and links to help you out!
A rule of thumb that is useful for entering any new internet forum - it's a good idea to hang back and get an idea of what sort of community it is before diving in. You say that you just typed some things in to Google and came here, and I think you would have benefitted from keeping your mouth shut and getting a feel for who hangs out here before talking. I do that in book groups - groups that have nothing to do with things as sensitive as sexism and privileges. Otherwise, I have no idea what sort of topics and tone and level of seriousness those people normally use, and I could make a complete idiot out of myself taking offense to something that the group routinely jokes about.
You're asking to be treated nicely, but you're also viewing your questions and peoples' responses as a single incident. In reality, there is a whole history of privileged people demanding education from unprivileged people. If you just hang back and read this site for a few days, you'll start to see that pretty quickly: Jos's newest post on the main page today is just one example of how often this happens and how people feel about it. So while you're viewing this as, "Hey, man, you should just be nice, niceness goes a long way," we're viewing it as, "ANOTHER one. Oh God. Seriously? Again? Can't these people read?"
And that's all I can really recommend - read. You say you don't want journal articles and essays, but taking even a half hour to read over the posts here on Feministing should demonstrate that the sort of voices you're looking for are already here for you to dive into and educate yourself with. We have a lot to say, so take advantage of it and listen.
A-fucking-men. I could not have put it better myself. Lifting a term from Renee of Womanist Musings, the STFU&L (Shut the fuck up & listen) phase is absolutely crucial for a privileged person entering a non-privileged group's space, if they don't want to make themselves out to be insensitive louts and gain at the least irritation and at the worst outright enmity from members of the non-privileged group.
If you're interested, there are actually lots of books out there that do exactly what you're looking for- blend personal experience with academic analysis. It's a fairly common format for contemporary feminist writings. A good place to start would be the book Listen Up! by Barbara Findlen.
Because of the issues that other commenters have already discussed with you, and because you're new to a lot of the subject matter, reading this kind of book might be a good place to start. It's personal stories on the authors' own terms, rather than at the request of someone else.
"So when you said that you can't see any day-to-day examples of harmful sexism, it sounded to me as if you were asking us all to defend the very existence of feminism. Feminism is such an important part of so many of our lives, that people may get offended when you come onto a feminist website and ask us to explain why feminism is still relevant."
This.
That is exactly what his last post felt like and I think that's what so many people got upset. I understand the OP is trying to learn but when you're new to a movement and admit that you're ignorant to a lot of the facts and feelings surrounding it you have to realize you're going to step on some toes and offend some people. And when that happens some of those people are not going to be so kind to you. It isn't our job to walk on eggshells for in in OUR space. I'm not saying this to be mean, I'm just stating the truth of the matter. So when you (the OP) says something like "some of those comments bordered on hurtful," instead of asking us to be more kind, maybe you should think about the fact that you came into our space and what you have done to upset so many of us in such a way. Research privilege. Research "check your tone" arguments. I think it would be very helpful to you in the future.
That was meant to be a reply to marie123's post. Whoops!
There is nothing wrong with asking questions, and don't let anyone try to tell you otherwise.
I beg to clarify. There is nothing inherently wrong with asking questions, but that doesn't mean that there is never anything wrong with asking certain questions of a particular person at a particular time in a particular circumstance. For example, no matter how curious you may be, it would never be ok to walk up to someone in the ER who has just survived a violent attack and ask them what it felt like, because you really want to know. If you're an investigator and the question will help you catch the perp, fine- with sensitivity. If you're just interested, go read a survivor's memoir.
I have a question for you, after we gave examples of sexism, do you see them now or are they still invisible? Take for example street harassment. I don't think many of my male friends (who don't engage in it themselves) would know it was a problem because we don't get harassed when walking with a man.
Also regarding the hostile comments, I find with any forum (and I believe that feministing commentators are a thousand times more open and friendly than a lot of other blogs/comments out there - see youtube or digg.com for example), there will always be those who jump down your throat. You could make a post saying "I love fluffy little puppies" and someone will find something wrong with it.
But I believe this to be a good thing because it makes me challenge myself and my beliefs. The only time I get really frustrated is when someone totally misrepresents what I have said and claims I have said something I haven't and then argues against the non-existent comment!
Hey,
It is interesting after reading the comments and stories you all put up I am actually much more aware of the acts and situations you all described. However what's curious is the affect goes largely unnoticed still. As in there is no reaction most of the time from women i know or see, which really either goes to show how entrenched in society it is, or how regular it has become for some women that they don't care anymore. I guess it sort of ties back to what i was originally asking when i made the blunder of referring to harmless sexism...i guess what i meant was does there come a point when something becomes so much a part of daily life that, on average, it goes unnoticed or doesn't bother you like it arguably should. Anyhow thanks for the comment
It is certainly possible that many women you "know or see" have "no reaction" to sexism or "don't care anymore." But it's also likely that many women in your life suffer from many of the same types of sexism mentioned on your blog, and do care, even if you don't see it.
Most of my closest male friends have never seen me get harassed on the street, because guess what? When I'm walking down the street with them, it doesn't happen! And it is frustrating to me that the most powerful people in our society (politicians, CEOs, media barons, financial types) are mostly men... but that is not a frequent topic of casual conversation among my male friends.
There are certainly some women who don't believe that sexism exists anymore, or believe that its effects in our society are minimal... but they're certainly not the majority. Keep your eyes and ears open, and perhaps the women in your life will help you become a bit more enlightened.
Oops, in the first paragraph, "mentioned on your blog" should be "mentioned on THIS blog."
Also, one more reason you might not be hearing about the ways that sexism harms your female friends... when I talk about sexism with many of my male friends (and even some of my female friends), their eyes glaze over and I often get responses like "is it really such a big deal?" or "come on, women have equal rights, let it go" etc. When people silence feminist discourse in this way, it makes it more difficult for men to learn about and fight the oppression of women... which in turn is worse for all of us! I'm not saying you necessarily do this, but even if a small number of people do it, it makes the rest of us afraid to speak out, or decide that it is not worth the effort.
have you read this journal beyond your own entry and comments?
HEllooooooo, anybody in there?!
This is something I have heard from a number of men before who didn't understand how everyday sexism could matter if women don't show a visible reaction to it.
One large reason that the women make no overt action or reaction that you can see when catcalled or otherwise harassed is that by reacting it usually provokes further interaction and escalation. This can be anything from increased sexist comments to physical violence.
It is not that we do not notice or do not care, it is that after years of living as women, we have learned that the easiest was to keep the situation from escalating is to show no reaction and move on as quickly as possible. This is not a preferred mode - it is simply what we do to protect ourselves.
I actually appreciated the chance to write about some experiences of sexism because in real life I so rarely get to, or like Lily A said, people's eyes gloss over and they stop listening.
Also in response to what you said about how entrenched it can be that women may not seem bothered by it, what I have noticed in my life is that I have become good at ignoring some things just so I can get through the day, even though they are killing me inside. I know I keep talking about street harassment but it is such a huge deal for me so I'll use another example regarding it. When I get street harassed I just carrying on walking as if I haven't heard it. This may give the impression it doesn't bother me, but it does, I just have to ignore it so the situation doesn't escalate.
Also thanks for replying to my post.
Hey,
It is interesting after reading the comments and stories you all put up I am actually much more aware of the acts and situations you all described. However what's curious is the affect goes largely unnoticed still. As in there is no reaction most of the time from women i know or see, which really either goes to show how entrenched in society it is, or how regular it has become for some women that they don't care anymore. I guess it sort of ties back to what i was originally asking when i made the blunder of referring to harmless sexism...i guess what i meant was does there come a point when something becomes so much a part of daily life that, on average, it goes unnoticed or doesn't bother you like it arguably should. Anyhow thanks for the comment
hey so glad that you are noticing these things more, because that it so great. The reason why most women don't do anything about it is because when we do, we are told that we are just "being hormonal" or we get asked "is it that time of the month again?" or worse yet we get told that we are just acting ike hysterical typical females. Then again we do nothing and we get told taht we are just doormats
Thanks for clearing up your motivations, but you still seriously need to check your privilege. I recommend shutting up and listening for a good long time. This isn't your safe space, so although you are welcome to contribute, you need to keep that fact in mind.
If you haven't already, I highly recommend checking out the feminism 101 blog, the Racialicious blog, and Shapely Prose (KateHarding.net). And don't forget that not only is it not our job to educate you, but if we DO decide to take the time out of our lives to educate yet another ignorant person, we are under no obligation to be polite. Insisting that we tone down the message and be polite is just another example of privileged people derailing and dismissing us, and we get that shit all the time.
...or, you could just not answer the question if you don't feel like you can take the time to be polite. If you feel like it is not your job to educate ignorant people (which it isn't,) then let others deal with it. There is way too much unwarranted hostility on feministing.
not to be rude, but its not being privileged to ask someone to be polite, its just asking for a sense of common decency. though I understand what your saying about the "privilege of my ignorance' I am by no means dismissing or derailing you by asking to be treated kindly, so on that I disagree.
Again, it's the history behind privileged people employing "tone" arguments, not your individual request for politeness.
When people who lack privilege complain about 'isms, it has historically been a silencing technique for the dominant group to critique their tone instead of responding to the content of their arguments. The mindfuck part is, they can use the politest tone possible, and they'd STILL get told they're not being polite enough. It's all about avoiding the issue (where do you think the ideas about angry feminists or angry black women came from? If they're ANGRY, all you have to do is shush 'em and tell them to watch their tone, you don't have to acknowledge that they might have something to be angry about!)
Now, I realize you might be sitting there saying, "But that's not what I'M doing," but those of us who have been at this for awhile have gone around and around and around this until it's another case of rolling our eyes and saying, "Oh God, not THIS again, really? Again?"
I think the "tone" argument is one that is abbencoy is not understanding the most right now. I mentioned it in my post up above as well and I think it's important. I really think it would benefit him to do some research on the silencing techniques of the "check your tone" type arguments so that he can see why people would even get upset when he enters our space and seemingly nicely asks us to be more polite.
So abbencoy, please, research "tone" arguments.
"I am by no means dismissing or derailing you by asking to be treated kindly, so on that I disagree"
As a few other posters have mentioned, I think there's quite a bit of history behind the tone arguments that you're unfamiliar with. Feminists are continually written off as being too angry and people often argue that women as a whole are overemotional and irrational. People use this argument as a means of dismissing legitimate concerns about sexism by saying that feminists are simply just being oversensitive and getting upset over nothing (The same tactics are used to silence people who speak out about race issues, homophobia etc.)
In addition, women in our society are taught to be polite and to worry about stepping on people's toes rather than speaking out about what they believe. When a women is assertive she's a bitch, but when a man is assertive he's simply confident.
These are all things that you should keep in mind before you tell people that they're being too harsh. I don't think you were really trying to dismiss people's arguments, but I think it's important to listen to what people have to say rather than worrying about how nice they were being when they said it. Overall I felt like most people responded to your post very respectfully and there were dozens of people who gave you very helpful insights into their experiences with sexism. Focus on the helpful responses you got and try to understand why your comments may have elicited anger in some people. Telling people to be nice is generally good advice, but it's not always appropriate, especially when you're dealing with issues that are so important to people's identity.
Here. Just...here. READ THIS NOW. http://www.derailingfordummies.com/ This covers pretty much a "how not to" for being a privileged person in a non-privileged group's space. You have, by my count, used "You Are Damaging Your Cause By Being Angry", "You're Being Hostile", "If You Cared About These Matters You'd Be Willing To Educate Me", and "If You Won't Educate Me How Can I Learn", in varying degrees. Perhaps not as starkly as in the examples presented at that link, but shades thereof. So, yeah, read that, read around, EDUCATE YOURSELF, and then come back in awhile and try engaging in discussion then. You'll probably get a lot less by way of angry responses then. What with the whole learning-to-check-your-privilege thing.
Best. Link. Ever. Thank you for this!!
The feminist movement is actually one of the most, er, aggressive in terms of using combative language. I always took this as a deliberate strategy to push the limits of assertiveness, to counter the way passivity is socialised into women.
Despite that, sometimes I have a reaction to language that appears downright rude, and my natural reaction is to walk away from a discussion like that. I have to consciously fight that reaction sometimes.
One of my earliest interactions with feminism, was the women's group at the university where I did my degree and their magazine. I picked one up out of interest at one point and then put it straight back down again. Why? The front cover read 'Fuck With Us, We Kill You!'
Sometimes I think feminism could stand to be a bit more polite.
That's... impressive, and goes way beyond tone arguments; a front cover like that would be controversial even if it was of male origin. In fact, possibly it would have been more controversial if of male origin, at least in that particular setting.
Thanks for your clarification. I agree with most of the responses here -- as many of us said in response to your original post, please go through and read the blog to get more individual stories.
And please take our concerns about not "taking up space" and "checking your privilege" seriously. I think the fact that you decided to make a whole new post about this, rather than reply to the original thread to keep that conversation going, shows that you still don't quite understand etiquette on this forum.
I do appreciate you trying to educate yourself, and I know that it's easy to make mistakes in the initial phase. Don't let the angry comments hurt your feelings -- let them spur you to learn about what makes many women so angry, and to be part of the solution rather than the problem!
Ya sorry about that, I was trying to respond to everyone cause so many people had things i wanted to respond to and i didn't know how to respond to a group of people on the original post. An amateur bloggers mistake, I will learn.
your post does come off as entitled, privileged and mean. I get that you probably are completely ignorant of that.
You have a long way to go in your learning process and a lot of privileged conditioning to get over.
You are asking use to entertain you by exploiting our stories, our experiences with the sexism we encounter every single day- for you, on a site that is thousands of entries loaded with the answer to your question.
STEP 1
Learn to listen
STEP 2
shut up and listen
STEP 3
listen and learn
get it?
abbencoy,
As the responses to your posts show, not all feminists are the same. Some have reacted negatively to your request while others have been glad to use the opportunity to send their ideas off beyond those who already know about feminism. Some have been telling you, in so many words, that if you submit to this education, it's going to be long, tough, and hard on you, and some believe that it ought to be like that because they think you've demonstrated that you deserve it. Personally, I haven't seen anything in your posts that excuses the pile-on you've gotten from some on this board.
Some have elaborated beautifully on all the wicked things that have said about feminists (they're angry, mean, etc.) that they believe they saw when you asked for politeness. But some of the things that have been said are below the belt or misrepresentations of what you actually wrote, which is an unfair thing because it makes conversation very difficult, and I wouldn't blame you if you never came back. Again, some want to make it very hard on you because you've expressed your willingness to learn, but they have a counterproductive way of "teaching." It can be very hard for some feminists to engage in ways that they feel compromises their feminist values - like respectfully talking to a man who has, without knowing it, offended them in some way. Their values take no prisoners, which is fine, but we aren't hypocrites if our values say one thing and the immediate needs of society - like the need to educate and to appeal to those people who are complicit in sexism - say another. That's a real rhetorical gap there that some feminists can't bridge because it would go against their principles. In this sense, *being* a feminist is often more important than going out there and risking feminism.
And I think someone can be verbally ridiculed only so much in a language or with a discourse that they don't understand before they want to call it quits and decide that feminists really are mean. There's a balance that needs sought between personal responsibility to learn about something and a willingness to teach - it has been said by bell hooks and others that feminists need to take some responsibility for the messages that are out there about feminism. To add to that, feminists are passionate about feminism, and they expect everyone else to be drawn to it, too, because it's "right" or it's a novel thing - but they take for granted that all the great things about feminism are visible to people who don't know about it. They think feminism is self-evident, and somehow it's your fault for not seeing that (despite the fact that many women came to feminism only after denial or difficulty seeing the use).
With that said, I don't know that feminists are always interested in reaching out or teaching. People claiming that Feministing is "our space" give away that they think there are people besides them who either aren't welcome or need to prove themselves if they "enter." All this sounds like a lot of dangerous possessiveness over a space that could benefit from many different voices, concerns, and questions. I'm surprised that in a space claiming to be feminist, there are so many people who want to plant there flag and say, "This space is mine," an odd response for a group that isn't a dominant group, that actually needs a lot more support than it actually has. For those who think that it's a waste of time having to "educate someone," I have to wonder, what are your goals? Is it just to "be feminist"? We do nothing to eliminate sexism if we don't engage where we can. If it isn't worth the engagement, then we ought to pass rather than spend time using someone as an available target for everything we find wrong with male privilege.
By the way, where is the line drawn for who can enter and speak and with what privileges? If we're posting on the internet after the libraries are closed, it means we have a computer at home, a nice privilege. And it means we know how to use it and to read and communicate with the symbols on the page - that's also a privilege potentially related to other privileges - like class or race or ability. Something feminists don't consider sometimes is that man-ness isn't some static, flat-line experience that carries the same amount of inherited privileges - it can be tempered by things like being of color, having a disability, being gay. It doesn't mean that being a man is nullified by these other things, but it should ask us to consider what other experiences people have besides those that are represented as the most important to feminists (that is, gender oppression). On one hand, feminists are willing to consider differences that women have as things that make women's experiences of gender much different - but on the other hand, we are willing to see a man as just a man, and to keep repeating something ambiguous about his privilege though we know nothing else about him.
abbencoy, I suggest taking a women's studies class in college if you can - teachers are required to treat you fairly there because it's for a grade, despite your privilege or whatever else you bring with you. Don't apologize for being interested in feminism. Good luck!
The single most important blog entry that made me realize I had white privilege and that I needed to shut the fuck up and read:
http://www.womanist-musings.com/2008/11/pearl-clutchers-and-straw-women.html
I'm just sayin'. Being all soft and accommodating and patting people on the head just isn't as effective as serving our reality straight up.
Heh, yeah, Renee was the one who taught me, ungently, about the STFU&L phase. I credit so much of my understanding of the dynamics of privilege to her influence.
Maybe you can direct me to where in my post I say something like "being all soft and accommodating and patting people on the head" is the way to go. It's hard to have a conversation when people won't contend with what you've actually written.
alixana, not everyone is the same. I, for one, prefer to both receive and dole out the head pats.
Beautifully written response, JessWin. I heartily concur with the advice to take a women's studies course. Discussions in person are oftentimes a lot more effective when you are making your first foray into a topic. Good luck, abbencoy.
And if you like the head-pats method of trying to get people to realize their privilege, good for you, I wish you well in it. However, there was an awful lot of attempts made in the other thread to discipline those of us who chose not to be indulgent and head-pat-y with the OP. The "OMG why can't you guys be nicer?" was thick in the air on that thread.
Wow. So it sounds to me like, in order for us to be the "right kind" of feminists, we have to be constantly willing to reach out, engage, and teach. We are not permitted to try to claim a space that is safe, a refuge from the world in which the need to be constantly on our guard, patient, and informative saps our energy and tries our patience. As feminist women we must always be available to the privileged people around us and ready to spring into action at every potential teachable moment. Gee, what does that sound like? Oh, that's right. All our patriarchal cultural narratives around womanhood and constant availability and being caretakers at the drop of a hat. That's why that sounded familiar. Honestly, is it too much to ask that a site by, for, and about feminists and feminism be ONE damn place that we can relax and talk amongst ourselves without having to always be ready to play Wise Woman at the drop of a hat for some entitled newbie?
Furthermore, has it not occurred to you that some of us may, in fact, engage in such gentle teaching behaviors elsewhere in the world than on here?
By the way, where is the line drawn for who can enter and speak and with what privileges?...Something feminists don't consider sometimes is that man-ness isn't some static, flat-line experience that carries the same amount of inherited privileges - it can be tempered by things like being of color, having a disability, being gay.
Oh hai, intersectionality, good to see you again, you who are not a new concept at all! JessWin, yes, it is true that a man who enters our space may not be benefiting from all aspects of privilege. He may stand at the intersection of any number of privileges and not-privileges. However, the point we were discussing here was specifically the OP's male privilege, so the rest of his privilege or lack thereof was less than relevant to the discussion at the time.
Such only becomes relevant if we wish to discuss your question of "how much privilege is too much". Which, honestly, is a silly question. No privilege is too much. A white, middle-class, able-bodied, cisgender, attractive, thin, Christian, heterosexual, monogamous, young man is perfectly welcome to the discussions here...provided he acknowledges those various forms of privilege, does not lean on them, and seeks to combat their impact. That's the only requirement. And with specific reference to the OP's male privilege, that is something he failed to do.
I'm surprised that in a space claiming to be feminist, there are so many people who want to plant there flag and say, "This space is mine," an odd response for a group that isn't a dominant group, that actually needs a lot more support than it actually has.
Speaking of odd responses...you've got this totally backwards. A non-dominant group needs a space to plant its flag even more vehemently than does the dominant group, since the dominant group has, more or less, the whole world to do with as it pleases. The dominant group can claim any space it occupies. So the non-dominant group, when it has a scrap of space, DOES need to plant its flag very, very firmly. That's not an odd response at all; it's exactly what one would expect.
Hi again Jadelyn,
1. I never said in order to be the "right kind" of feminists we have to be constantly reaching out. I never defined wrong feminist/right feminist - instead, I tried to suggest that some actions are more useful - not more "true" or "right," but useful, productive, constructive.
2. Needing a "refuge from the world" and a "safe space" is all fine and good - but it's odd that on one hand, "newbies" need verbal lashings to be initiated into feminism, but feminists ought to have spaces where they don't even have to explain themselves. I don't think Valenti's goal was to make a blog where feminists can be protected from the world while they console each other. Among other things, it's a place where feminists can be critical. But it's odd that feminist women need safe spaces every now and then, no matter what privileges they have, but anyone with male privilege needs to indisputably prove his alliance with the feminist cause before entering or he's going to get it. I've avoided using the word "essentialist," but it's gotten to the point in this discussion where it's clear that the criticism is in order. Not all feminists think alike, but they're all welcome in the safe space? What about my own criticisms in this space? Do they endanger my membership?
3. So suggesting that we ought to educate people respectfully reifies the "caretaker" expectation, but wanting to demarcate a space just for us so that we can protect each other from the world and nurse each other's wounds doesn't?
4. Yes, intersectionality again: "the point we were discussing here was specifically the OP's male privilege, so the rest of his privilege or lack thereof was less than relevant to the discussion at the time." I know you are annoyed that I brought up intersectionality again, but what you said in those above quotes ignores it. You are isolating one part of someone's identity when it doesn't exist without everything else. Your wording, "he may stand at the intersection of any number of privileges and not-privileges," sounds like privileges and oppressions are self-contained, undisturbed things. It's never less relevant that I'm white just because I'm a woman. Identity isn't a grid where we trace the line for "white" and for "woman," and we identify where they intersect.
5. You wrote, "Such only becomes relevant if we wish to discuss your question of 'how much privilege is too much'. Which, honestly, is a silly question." - I never said that. You made up a question I didn't ask, called it a silly question, then you answered it anyway. I'm not sure what part of my post you were trying to respond to, so I'll have to ignore that.
6. Re: my flag-planting comment. I suggested that it's an odd thing for a group that isn't part of the status quo to have such uncompromising high requirements for entrance. That this is "totally backwards," as you suggest, is only one way of looking at it. My argument is that this impulse to demarcate a space, sit in it, and check everybody's IDs at the door does more harm than good - unless you only want to be consoled in your space and have power over those who enter, then it makes sense. You say it's necessary for non-dominant groups to seek out space and plant the flag because dominant groups do that; true, but at some point you start acting like the dominant group. Again, it's this cherry-picking of identity that is such a problem - if I call myself a feminist, I'm not part of the status quo. But my white skin says I am, and I've been protected from sexism at times when my sisters of color haven't been - so how can this be a safe space for feminist women when the privilege is free-flowing in this way? I'm trying to challenge this idea that feminists are alike enough that they can create a space that ought to be undisturbed.
Allow me to point out where you did, in fact, ask the silly question I was answering:
By the way, where is the line drawn for who can enter and speak and with what privileges?
I may have reworded it, but you asked it.
(And no, I'm not bothering to argue with you on the rest of it, because I flat out have better ways to spend my weekend, and I doubt I'd change your mind anyway. Just wanted to point out that one factual inaccuracy. Have a good one.)
Thanks for the comment. It's nice to be reminded of the facets of a group, it gives better perspective for sure. I wish I could take a women studies course, unfortunately I am working my way through med school and they don't leave any free time for optional courses. Maybe when I'm finished I'll give it a try. Thanks again, I really enjoyed what you had to say.
A lot of posts on this blog and elsewhere can complement your medical education... please seek out information about the ways women often have troubles with our health care system, for example: lack of access to a full range of reproductive health services and information about them, having our body image damaged by doctors who find it easier to criticize a number on a scale than help us find ways to live healthy lifestyles, being treated like we are not fully competent when we are pregnant, etc.
This site is dedicated to blogging about the sexism that comes up in our lives every day! Read it for a week or two and do some personal reflection on it.
I didn't really read too much of your first entry. You just busted on a scene that is supposed to be for like minded feminists and said "hai guyz! i don't believe sexism exists lol!" I don't really know how much farther it went.
So, probably the first step would be training yourself to listen instead of talk.
i still given abbencoy some pretty sincere credit for coming back for more here. i don't care if that makes me seem coddling and whatever. and i don't expect everyone to agree with me (i kinda don't care if they do either). but it's personal. i picture my brother or someone asking these questions and getting shot down and well... most people spend their lives in blinders and i want to give credit where credit is due.
But was he really "shot down" in his original post? Yes, there were several commenters who were offended and responded harshly. But there were even more people who took the time to write long, thoughtful posts detailing the sexism they face. Instead of focusing on these thoughtful responses, everyone (including the OP) is fixating on the fact that some people were offended. I don't think this is fair.
I don't think anyone is obligated to be kind. Civil, yes, but kind? Not necessarily. I go with civil for the first few interactions and bring on the whup ass for repeated douchehattery.
thanks
.........