Community, I come to you today with a dilemma that has been weighing heavily on my mind recently. I am currently in the fourth year of my PhD program in English and anticipate going on the job market in the next year or so. During my studies, I've also nearly completed a graduate certificate in Women's Studies and certainly intend to finish it. The thing is, I'm a while, male, middle class, and heterosexual. As you all know, that makes me a member of an extraordinarily privileged group in our society. I believe that I've come to terms with this, though I still struggle with finding effective ways to put this privilege aside.
In any case, here's my question: once I land a job (let's just assume that I do instead of getting into all the reasons why the humanities market is overcrowded), can I legitimately teach classes about feminism? With all of my studies, I hope that I'm assembling some form of expertise, but, unlike other areas, this doesn't automatically give me credibility. Could I even hope to be a driving force in a classroom when I'm a part of such a privileged group?
A followup question to this would be, SHOULD I teach classes like this if the opportunity arises? Is that the place of a man in this field/movement? My concern is the education of young men and women. Can I reach the people who take these classes? Will they take me seriously? Can I only be an ally and not an educator?
So that's the dilemma I've been wrestling with for the last few months. Any opinions are helpful, or if you know of any feminist writers who have tackled this subject, pointing me their way would also help.
Thanks for listening.


0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Men Teaching Feminism.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/16376













That you have accumulated knowledge and aim to educate and enlighten is justification enough, in my book. Perhaps you will serve as an example to other men that it is possible to be a feminist and to advance feminist causes if you are not a woman and not a member of an historically oppressed group. After all, had only African-Americans or LGBTs alone pushed for their deserved rights, I doubt they alone would have accomplished what a combined group effort did.
Feminism isn't related to gender. Its a belief. Its not physical. You could be sexless and a feminist.
After all, look at all the misogynistic women.
I think you definitely should be teaching. Twould set a good example.
Agreed with the comments above, go for it and maybe you can inspire many other men to become feminists as well :)
Speaking from personal experience, I had such a great professor in college who was a white, upper middle class male (I'm fairly certain he was heterosexual but I never really knew for sure) and he was an excellent professor and one of the teachers who really got me into feminism. If it wasn't for him and my other two professors I don't think I'd be the person I am today. :)
Yes, the one major benefit that popped into my mind was the possibility that many more male students would be willing and interested in a class in women's studies if it was taught by a male prof...kind of an ice breaker to the topic.
I just hope you don't win the position over any equally qualified woman...
As far as you privileged, having a member of a very privileged group talking about the importance of ridding society of these privileges would have a very big impact on similarly privileged students, I believe. My white professors never put their white privilege out there, but I think I would have been really interested if they had.
You might want to check out www.hugoschwyzer.net - he's a male feminist who teaches classes on feminism at a community college in California. He's written about this topic before, and while I couldn't find the specific posts I had in mind to link you to, you might find reading his whole blog interesting given your common interests.
One way you could ameliorate your male privilege in a classroom setting is to direct your students to the non-privileged voices who have written and spoken so much in this field already. Cite, give credit to, and reference all the non-male, non-white, and/or non-hetero voices so that they're teaching through you and your students are aware that you're just helping them sort through and understand all the voices out there.
being in a privileged group, and talking about how that privilege works in society would be a very beneficial thing for a university to have. Many male students are intimidated by women's studies classes because they are male and they think that they are going to be attacked for it. While the overwhelming majority of women's study profs-both male and female- would never let that happen, I think a lot of guys would not for sure that they aren't going to be hammered for their privilege if a man was teaching the class. And while that in and of itself is a gender stereotype and needs to be addressed it's still there, and once you get them in the door then you can teach them why their thinking is wrong and hurtful. Go you for getting your degree in something so worthwhile, hope you have fun as a teacher
You are being too critical of yourself.
Were you a cardiologist, you you beat yourselfup because you'd never suffered a heart attack?
The world needs more feminist men! Most definitely! Not only would it break stereotypes, it would set an example for young men. I think people simply don't KNOW what the word "feminist" means. It needs as many positive faces as possible. Go for it!
You can do whatever you want, as long as you come at it from your own position and don't try to hit it from the same perspective as all the female women's studies teachers. What people here are saying about acknowledging privilege is probably the best example, because that's a topic where your voice holds more weight. But the best classes are usually the ones that are situated most thoroughly in fact; as long as you bring serious knowledge to the table and can answer questions intelligently, that's what matters.
Short version: No one will care about your color or your dick as long as you can do your job well.
I'm a freshman at a giant private, world renowned university with a pitiful women's studies program. I'm taking 5 classes this semester and my ONLY male professor happens to be my women's studies professor. He is amazing, and I adore him. For a moment I almost thought you WERE him (same credentials). To be blunt, he isn't teaching us HOW to be women . . . he's teaching ABOUT women and their struggle and the nuances involved with that. He's a wonderful teacher and very approachable. While this is unfortunate, some of the girls in my class have said they PREFER him to a "feminazi." Of course I hate that term, but if you can help bring college women to feminism simply by being approachable, you're what we need.
In short? Do it. At my school, please :-)
You can but you should not. You could in all good conscience teach a class in the “role of men in Feminist Culture”.
Really? I was so excited to see all the positive comments and then yours came about. Why should he not be allowed to teach a feminist studies course? Because he is a man? So then I guess ALL women are suitable to teach womens studies, even the misogynistic women.
Why has no one else addressed this comment?
I don't agree with it, but I don't think that position is way out there.
As a man, there is obviously a perspective about women and woman's issues that the OP lacks. I emphatically believe that such a lack of perspective does NOT preclude him from teaching a formal course about those issues, but I can understand how someone might.
I think it is possible to respectfully educate people about a topic without setting yourself up as an Authority on the subject, and I think this is a huge part of an ally's role.
I don't think it's about whether or not he should or shouldn't, but rather, with his gender privilege and knowledge of feminism, what can he do that will most effectively rid sexism and pass on feminist knowledge.
I agree with you that such a course as you mentioned is important, and that, if made available, the OP ought to teach it. However, being that the majority of women's studies programs (and not that they're wrong) still focuses very heavily on women's experiences, such classes are rare.
In the end, it's about the feminist community and women's studies having more allies. We have to crawl before we can run. If having a genuine feminist male teaching women's studies is the best that we can get, until more men are committed to ending sexism, then I say he should teach women's studies.
The comments already posted have been great. Here's one more way of looking at it. You've probably taught undergrads before, while finishing your Ph.D. Think about how much you've learned about women's issues, women's history, and feminist-oriented ways of analyzing texts over the course of your education. Think about how much time have you spent spent thinking through (and writing about) those issues. Now compare that to how much the typical undergrad student knows about those topics. You're vastly more educated and aware than they are about the issues you'd be teaching. Many of your students would have barely begun to even think about the need for feminism and women's studies.
Will they "take you seriously"? Well, I should certainly hope so. A Ph.D. in English represents an enormous amount of expertise in your chosen field. We wouldn't want people saying, for instance, that a black women can't be taken seriously teaching Renaissance poetry; it's the same in this case.
as someone with male privilege, students will take you more seriously than they would take a female professor.
if you want to use your privilege for good, this seems like the best way to do it.
As a fellow academe and a woman who took Women's Studies classes as an undergrad, I say, "YES!!" Definitely.
It's so needed. There are a lot of guys who feel like they can't acknowledge sexism or patriarchy without claiming personal guilt, so they deny they exist. A male instructor might demonstrate that we can talk about the problem w/o having to be personally defensive.
My answer to your question is that yes, you can "only" be an ally, but that doesn't mean that you cannot be an educator. While I personally won't be handing you a feminist card anytime soon, I think it's the responsibility of allies to be educators in whatever capacity they have. I am neither a transfeminist nor a womanist, but it is my responsibility to educate those around me, to speak up for my trans and womanist fellow women. Not because they cannot speak for themselves, but so they do not always have to speak for themselves alone. If you have the ability to educate in a more formal setting, I think you can do good by doing so, as an ally.
I also second alixana's comment about making sure non-privileged voices are heard in your classroom. Make sure your readings are representing more than the center.
Thanks for all of the encouraging comments, everyone. I'm glad to hear that so many of you believe that there is a place for me as an educator in feminism. I understand your cautions about representative readings, and, as with anything I teach, providing a broad spectrum of positions is definitely a priority a priority of mine.
Thanks especially to alixana for the Schwyzer link. I've only had a chance to skim the site so far, but it seems really helpful so far.
As I understand, the chair of women's studies at the University of Washington is male. So, indeed, there have been cases where men have entered women's spaces and have done so well and at the same time did not disturb the dialogue or growth of the community.
Do remember that your gender no matter how genuine you are in your quest, does matter, perhaps not to you, but to the women in your class, whose experiences might render them silent because of your presense. I am just not sure what the solution might be, but I (and it's just me) that students might receive you much better of your presence appears to be one of facilitator rather than authority.
Lastly - and this is for a larger discussion within gender studies - what are the possibilities of you teaching gender studies classes, aimed at men and the deconstruction of masculinity? It seems there lacks a study of masculinity and gender roles within women's studies, and I think such a class will not only open new dialogue, but also put the onus of ending sexism on men - a group that, especially on college campuses, is in need of being engaged. Just as women's paradigms have been changed because of women-focused women's studies classes, allowing them to break the cycles of sexism, men-focused gender-studies classes can also help men break that cycle of sexism all of us have grown into.
I suggest looking up and talking to Michael Kimmell, professor of sociology at SUNY Brookstone. He's a male feminist professor and spokesperson for the National Organization for Men Against Sexism. I believe he teaches a male and masculinity class aimed exclusively at men. Link to his department's page is below.
http://www.sunysb.edu/sociology/?faculty/Kimmel/kimmel2
Good luck to you!
huh. I'm probably attending UW in the fall next year, and I didn't know that! But I'm going for the neurology program.
The more you know, eh?
Also, I recommend a highly academic book about men's involvement in femiminism entitled "Men in Feminism" by Alice Jardine. It's a collection of essays about men's role within feminism. Rather than a primer, it explores gender and power, standpoint theories and lived experiences, and how they all affect men's involvement within feminism.
I bought it as an e-book, and would be happy to pass the password along so you can download it if you'd like.
Marc
I dislike comments saying that he should teach classes aimed at men. Really? I think that just further sends the message that men and women are sooooooo different and should have separate classes.
So what if he were trans? What if he didn't identify as male or female? Who should he teach then?
This isn't about him, or that men and women are different, but that the gender experiences are different, for women and men. At the same time, the power of testimony, as well as gender power, are different for women and men.
The thing is there is clearly a need for male feminsts to engage males of college age groups who seriously need an introduction to feminism. It's not about dividing the genders, but rather, figuring out our resources, taking into account gender experiences, and going about deconstructing sexism the best way possible.
He would be more useful to feminism, just as I am, just as many other men are, by engaging men than women. After all, there isn't really anything that we can tell women, as men, about sexism that they don't already know or have experienced.
"After all, there isn't really anything that we can tell women, as men, about sexism that they don't already know or have experienced."
If it were true that you learn't everything you needed to know about how sexism worked simply by being a woman then there would be no need for women's studies classes (except for men).
I'm sure there is plenty of theory a man educated in feminism can teach women who have not been similarly educated.
Well, I would argue that women's studies isn't meant to "teach" women anything, especially the more primer courses, but rather, to give women space and a voice to make sense of their individual experiences as women, and collectively, as the women gender. I, as a man, won't be able to tell women anything about their own experiences that they don't already know - nor can any other man, no matter how much feminism he studies.
In short, I see women's studies courses, for women, as highly-organized and academic consciousness raising groups. The same courses, for men, are opportunities to listen to something, because of their gender, they don't get to often hear.
All we men can do is examine those experiences women testify, and try to change our own lives, as well as policies, for women.
So, no, while we certainly bring forth theories and exchange ideas, we aren't really fitting to "teach" anything. First-hand knowledge of women's experiences are limited to women, and because each woman is different, despite a shared status as women, we cannot teach women - we can only facilitate.
Marc
By that argument you're basically invalidating women's studies as a field of study. You're saying it's a big talk fest where the main purpose is to vent and maybe learn how to articulate that venting. I can't accept that.
Women's studies has to be about learning: learning about the history of oppression, the intersectionality of it, the psychcology; and the philosphy of feminism and how it seeks to resolve the problem. Teachings in those things are trasferrable between one woman and the next and between men and women.
Sure, the participants in women's studies classes will seek to place their own experience in this context and that will be more relevant (read as identifiable) for women, but an understanding of the broader context is key and that can be studied and taught.
I really hope you do it, and I hope that you give weight to the reality that men can (and should) be strong feminists. You might feel more comfortable if you started your semesters by mentioning the male elephant in the room and making your students feel comfortable sharing their voices.
I feel like a lot of people are stuck in outmoded ideas of what teaching is about. Sure, if he's just up there lecturing, his gender might be an issue. But if he's guiding a conversation within a community of learners, then it shouldn't matter nearly as much.
this is a complex topic for me.
i am a college student currently living in texas, but i am from boston (as seen in my name). in my history class we were recently discussing the holocaust. in boston, there is a very high jewish population, of which i belong to. i have known many survivors. here in texas, most people are baptist; many students here, i was shocked to learn, havent even heard of the holocaust before this class. my professor gave a very nice lecture on the topic. but i didnt stir my soul the way hearing memoirs from survivors has, or even hearing lectures from jewish teachers.
as a man, to stir the souls of our students; you need to go that extra mile. you need to make your students care by showing them why you, a man, care. so, can you teach women's studies? yes. perhaps you could even use that as your first lecture: why you teach about feminism, why you care, and why your students, regardless of gender, should care as well. good luck!
Depends on where you are in Texas on how many Baptists there are. And I don't think the Baptist thing is the reason people didn't learn about the Holocaust when they should have (high school). Here in Houston we have a Holocaust museum and I learned quite a bit about the Holocaust in my high school, including taking a trip to the museum. So, I know the hating on Texas thing is fun and all, but it's a big state and there are lots of different schools and such.
I know it's a bit off topic, but I just get annoyed with general "Texans are ________" comments.
More on topic, just because someone hasn't lived through a specific type of oppression or isn't a target of oppression does not mean they cannot engage a group of people or speak soulfully and passionately about that oppression. I've had male feminist teachers before and they often moved me as much as my female feminist teachers (sometimes even more so. I had a female visiting professor for a woman's studies class and it was a huge snooze fest. I would have rather skipped class and just read the text book.). It really does depend on the person. I guess I just don't think it's okay to tell people "you can't do this because of your sex." A passionate ally is a passionate ally, no matter who they may be, and they can be effective no matter what their sex may be. :)