Film Review: Liberian Women Forge a Real-Life Lysistrata

A Review by Jaye Austin Williams

From On The Issues Magazine

In early 2003, a collective dramatic gesture, starting in the United States as a correspondence between two actresses, spread like a brush fire around the world. Called "The Lysistrata Project," theatre companies hosted 750 staged readings in 49 countries of the Aristophanes satire. The phenomenon was in protest of the war in Iraq.

Such collective gestures by members of the artistic community are not new, of course. They are, in fact, emblematic of the intertwining of art and socio-politics which harbors an impulse of nobility; namely, an articulation of resistance against wrongs in the hope that it will be to some positive effect. The Lysistrata Project utilized a play from antiquity about women galvanizing in protest against men’s propensity for conflict by withholding sex, deploying the one gambit sure to give men pause no matter how entrenched they may be in their antagonistic endeavors.

Aristophanes’ text has piqued rigorous debate about whether or not it is a feminist tract, given that its protagonist would be hard-pressed, in any real-life sense, to galvanize women on so grand a scale, and appears to be supremely content with the return to the status quo so long as the men cease and desist from their warring.

Still, The Lysistrata Project’s use of this fictitious, satirical gesture by a Greek male author and comedic master makes sense 16 centuries later.

But is there a relationship between that global gesture and one staged in the same year, amidst a theatre of war all too real, by Black women in a country situated on the west coast of Africa? For these women, the stakes were perilously high. Pathos rather than comedy was the framework surrounding the mortal risk they undertook. Yet their gesture resided curiously outside the "global" purview of "The Lysistrata Project."

Such was the action orchestrated by Leymah Gbowee, a Liberian social worker, one of a constellation of Liberian women whose poised, earnest and eloquent retrospective testimonies are captured by executive producers Gini Reticker and Abigail Disney in their documentary film, Pray the Devil Back to Hell.

The film, initially released in the Spring of 2008 at New York’s Tribeca Film Festival, documents a collective testament in response to the cumulative effects of the Civil War that erupted in Liberia in 1989. Its abject and divisive toll on the citizens of Liberia was so great that the women were moved to risk their lives in demanding the war’s cessation.

Staging a Platform for Peace

Responding to the rapes of women and children, fast-rising cost of bulgur wheat, diminished access to water and other basic resources under Liberian President Charles Taylor’s regime, the women look to the Biblical story of Esther as their inspiration. Dressed in white to signify peace, and with a big banner that reads "THE WOMEN OF LIBERIA WANT PEACE NOW," women, eventually reaching thousands, decide to camp out at the fish market every day. While they are there, Taylor’s convoy passes by, slowing down to survey the women. Loved ones worry for the women’s safety.

The women insist that the warring parties participate in peace talks. Taylor finally meets with the presidents of South Africa and Nigeria and others at a peace summit in Ghana. In a surprise move, Taylor is charged with crimes against humanity and flees. (Taylor is now involved in an ongoing trial at The Hague. ) Faced with persistent destabilization in Liberia, the women continue to speak out until the international community acts and a transitional government is established.

CONTINUE READING AT On The Issues Magazine

and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Anony-mouse
    Posted February 26, 2010 at 5:09 am | Permalink

    Just a quick note about Lysistrata. Modern interpretations of the play tend to overlook the fact that in the ancient Greek world view women were seen as the sexual aggressors and were in possession of a greater libido than men. Thus Lysistrata’s rebellion implied not merely that the women were willing to deprive men of sex to end the war. It also implied that the women felt so strongly about it that they were willing to deprive themselves of sex, which would be more painful for them because of their more powerful libidos.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

166 queries. 0.454 seconds